The F2 is without peer in 35mm cameras. And mine is in absolute mint condition. But actually I've been finding myself partial to the 1970 F with complete motor drive and plain finder I recently picked up for a song. This F has a strange charm with that motor drive and battery pack that looks like a jury-rigged factory after thought. Although I have to carry it in my hand to keep the strap rings from worming out the eyelets. Besides, with those eyelets sticking out the ends of the body, even if you used the strap, it would just keep flipping over frontwards. and how 'bout that shutter release on the BACK of the camera, forcing to to curl your finger? A strange bird, bu a legacy work horse for sure. The F2 is refined to a perfection no other camera even came close to.
I have 3 F's and 1 F2 Mint with MD2 and MD3, and plenty of good old non-AI lenses. No more. Besides, Nikon went out of business when they dropped F2 and Nikkormat. Once you've manufactured perfection and it ran its course, there is no way but down.
Your favorite pre-AI lenses?
I'm starting a little collection of pre-AI lenses with the intent of keeping them pre-AI for the DP-1 camera in this thread and for the F.
Another F2 thread on Photrio that should be mentioned:
Nikon F2 - DIY Repairs & Maintenance
I eBay purchased an old beat up F2 for less than a carton of beer. It was jammed, the Finder dismantled, shutter crinkled, rusty, dusty, no power to the finder - basically a basket case. So a good project to see if I could get it working again, which I did and successfully. Unable to find much...www.photrio.com
@ic-racer I'm impressed by your activity and electromechanical expertise.
Where do your patients come from?
I didn't mean to hijack is excellent thread, but if I may answer that question, it may or may not speak for him. "Where does the patience come from"? 1) You've got to want it. 2) And once started, quitting is not acceptable. Once you've opened it up you're committed and you have to see it through. I'm not sure that's "patience" or not. It's more of a feedback loop you've trapped yourself in, which brings you back to #1. Number 3 is that poor work is unacceptable and excellent work is all that is allowed. Nowhere in that is it expressed or implied that you always know what you're doing, which often means doing it over, as many times as it takes. Patience be damned.
The F2 is without peer in 35mm cameras. And mine is in absolute mint condition. But actually I've been finding myself partial to the 1970 F with complete motor drive and plain finder I recently picked up for a song. This F has a strange charm with that motor drive and battery pack that looks like a jury-rigged factory after thought. Although I have to carry it in my hand to keep the strap rings from worming out the eyelets. Besides, with those eyelets sticking out the ends of the body, even if you used the strap, it would just keep flipping over frontwards. and how 'bout that shutter release on the BACK of the camera, forcing to to curl your finger? A strange bird, bu a legacy work horse for sure. The F2 is refined to a perfection no other camera even came close to.
To complete my little collection I just got an all black "Apollo" F. I know you know, but for the others, the so-called "Apollo" version was made at the same time the F2 was available and had a plastic tip on the wind lever and the timer lever. Also, stainless reinforced strap lungs (though still in the same cumbersome location). I'll probably start a little thread on that one too.
Actually I've always admired the original F1, but never used one. But the original F1 indeed had a brawny beauty about it.. But an internal meter all these years later puts it out of contention. An F or F2 can always have another meter slapped on it. Or a plain prism. A Canon F1 with a dead meter cell is a permanently broken camera. And Canon could never make up their mind on a lens mount for the ages. Every so often a manufacturer makes a product that can never be beaten. Revox with their A77. Nikon with their F2...Clearly you have never used Canon F1, any version.
Actually I've always admired the original F1, but never used one. But the original F1 indeed had a brawny beauty about it.. But an internal meter all these years later puts it out of contention. An F or F2 can always have another meter slapped on it. Or a plain prism. A Canon F1 with a dead meter cell is a permanently broken camera. And Canon could never make up their mind on a lens mount for the ages. Every so often a manufacturer makes a product that can never be beaten. Revox with their A77. Nikon with their F2...
Olympus 4T had bar far best metering logic of anything ever made in 35 mm world, yet mechanically it feels second class. if only F1 ever had its guts, oh well.
Holding and operating Nikons then the the F1s there is objectively no comparison. They simply feel made by a different class of mechanical engineering.
Did you look inside all of the cameras mentioned to make these statements?
I don’t think I need to, the film advance, how finders and screens fit, how shutter responds is enough to hear and feel the difference of intervals. I never knock down Nikons, they made great cameras. Calling F2 as one without peers is simply indicative how public is swayed by advertising and hear say,
I think if you open up the SLRs and compare the mechanics, you'll see only first-class solutions and material quality. These cameras were built for rigorous, continuous use; no one is better or worse than the other; this is the top league.
No point of gong further. If one cannot feel& hear the difference between mechanics of F1 and F2 then that is end of the road. F2 finders almost feel loose by comparison, screens same thing, film advance is clearly tighter mechanically on the F1, even the back door gives different tactile feedback.
As I said before, Nikons made great cameras, and they clearly lasted as long as anyone would have wished for, subjected to pro rigours just like F1 line up. Canon may have failed some audience with some design solutions, but it is highly debatable whether Canon's approach to in camera metering was a disadvantage to Nikon's finder only. I'd argue otherwise, whether or not 30+ focusing screens were necessary to cover all aspects of photography. It's a moot argument as it does not cover the actual mechanics of these cameras.
If it makes any difference to anyone, Canon and Nikon both made great quality pro level cameras. When one sticks to a brand it's hard to think of the other, especially if it's impossible to be dissatisfied with what Nikon offered. Still I stand behind what I said on the mechanics, different class of precision engineering, perhaps in some areas that were immaterial to a lasting functional quality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?