It was the soft touch covering era. The buying public beta tested an underdeveloped camera coating at their own expense. Nikon weren't the only culprit but were probably the best known. It was too volatile for camera use.I have researched it and figured out how to clean it but what is the reason for it. I was just given an F100 unused for a few years and it had a corroded batter compartment and the leather was sticky as hell. I went to check my own F100 a couple of years unused and discovered it is getting stick too. Nasty.
As far as I'm aware none of the current manufacturers use the coating that went sticky. It was prevalent in the 1990s. It varied, some just went slightly tacky and is useable with powdered chalk or similar, others have become unusable. I had a set of Sigma lenses that literally melted in a drawer.But now the problem is so well known they should use a different materials but obviously they don't.
I do not wish to highjack this thread about the F100 and my question is loosely related as it concerns another Nikon of the same era, namely, the F5. Is sticky leather a problem that inflicts the F5 as well? I don't think I can recall the F5 being cited in this sticky leather context but as someone who has wondered about buying one I'd appreciate your experience. It doesn't seem to merit a separate thread. especially if the answer is hopefully a simple: " No, the F5 is not affected.
Thanks
pentaxuser
But such stuff is still applied. I got kitchen utensils and a beard-trimmer that get sticky in short time. These rubberlike surfaces are trendy and thus applied.I suspect Nikon and others were lied to by the supplier of the coating and didn't do enough testing or validation on their own. But in the end, the camera manufacturer should be responsible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?