Nikon F and F2

Hidden

A
Hidden

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Is Jabba In?

A
Is Jabba In?

  • 2
  • 0
  • 32
Dog Opposites

A
Dog Opposites

  • 2
  • 3
  • 132
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

A
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

  • 6
  • 5
  • 222
Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 1
  • 0
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,477
Messages
2,759,659
Members
99,514
Latest member
cukon
Recent bookmarks
0

kivis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
312
Location
South Florid
Format
35mm
I have a Nikon F since 1974 (bought it used). A few years ago a friend offered me his F2 on permanent loan. Didn't see anything all that great about it over the F. Now he is calling me again, to give it a second chance. Am I missing something?
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,068
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have Fs and F2s. The ergos on the F2s are much better, with a better placement of the shutter button, much improved film loading (hinged back), better shutter speed range etc.
There is a reason Nikon introduced it and phased out the F..

I still have lots of fun using my Fs, but the F2 is the natural progression. If none of the changes matter to you, then they don't matter!
 

narsuitus

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Back in the 1960s when I was working for a newspaper, I was using two Nikon F cameras. In the early 1970s, when the Nikon F2 was first introduced, I tried one. Some of the features I liked were:

Motor drive - interchangeable from one F2 body to another instead being custom made for each F body.

Shutter release - F2 position was better ergonomically

Hinged back on F2 was better than removable F back

Mirror lockup on F2 did not require loss of one frame like F

After using the F2 for a while, I replaced my two Nikon F cameras with two F2 cameras and never regretted that decision. In fact, I still use one of the two Nikon F2 bodies that I purchased back in 1972. I replaced the other body that I purchased back in 1972 after I dropped it on concrete.



Nikon F2 by Narsuitus, on Flickr
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,499
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I agree with narsuitus, my first Nikon was an factory modified motor drive body, when I upgraded to a F2S I found the F2 to much easier to use in the field. The F2 is very robust build, and the S head meter was very accurate. Later I again upgraded to a F3P, another great camera with additional features, but like the weight and size of the F2 better than the F3.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,236
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
F2 fixed the few things that the F got wrong. Nikon F is derived from Nikon rangefinders. F2 was a clean sheet design. F with the plain prism is beautiful. F2 with a plain prism is beautiful and easier to use . F3 is elegant, more styled and a really wonderful camera. I have all 3,
Smart person buys a perfect F3, romantic buys an Apollo F with plain prism, F2 is a bit of a muscle car, had the most accessories, and with the md-2 motor drive So Cool.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,236
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
The F2 looks like it was styled by a pimp.

WHO'S YOUR DADDY? F2, DE-1 Prism MD-2 motor w/ MB-1 battery pack hold 10 1.5 V AA cells. You could start a Buick with that!

PIMP? The APEX of Japanese Mechanical 35mm Design and Manufacturing. MHO YMMV

(It looks even better in black!)

20180517_223131-1_resized.jpg
 
OP
OP
kivis

kivis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
312
Location
South Florid
Format
35mm
Hi Kivis,

I am with you on this one. I had F, F2 and F3. On the end I have sold F2, somehow it did not worked for me as good as original F, cannot explain exactly why.
Now I have F with plain prism, and F3 when I want aperture priority.
My F is a plain prism and I use the Nikon FE for aperture preferred.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,236
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Don't get me wrong I have 2 Apollo F, and an early F. The Apollo F has got the F2 advance lever, probably the best looking Nikon made . There's so much history that was witnessed by the F and F2. Really amazing cameras. The pimp comment I find whimsical. Both cameras are amazing
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,492
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
It may be that the improvements of the F2 over the F are not important to you.

In addition to the obvious hinged back, relocated shutter release, and other features mentioned above, many people are still unaware that the F2:

* has stepless shutter speeds between 1/80 and 1/2000

* self-timer delay from 2 to 10 seconds

* slow timed speeds from 2 to 10 seconds
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,236
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
It may be that the improvements of the F2 over the F are not important to you.

In addition to the obvious hinged back, relocated shutter release, and other features mentioned above, many people are still unaware that the F2:

* has stepless shutter speeds between 1/80 and 1/2000

* self-timer delay from 2 to 10 seconds

* slow timed speeds from 2 to 10 seconds
And the stepless shutter speeds WITHOUT an electronic shutter.
The F shutter release is definitely odd to me, but I grew into the F2 in high school. F2 is the ergonomic standard that even the D5 uses today. Both the F and F2 are so beautiful I have had a hard time not buying them when the price and condition was favorable. Items of gratification !
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,622
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
It may be that the improvements of the F2 over the F are not important to you.

In addition to the obvious hinged back, relocated shutter release, and other features mentioned above, many people are still unaware that the F2:

* has stepless shutter speeds between 1/80 and 1/2000

* self-timer delay from 2 to 10 seconds

* slow timed speeds from 2 to 10 seconds

I never had the F so I can't say which is better. I had the F2AS since 1977 until 1984 and I liked it very much. I am aware of all the features you listed and when I bought it I was very proud of those. Today, those features mean nothing to me. I would want the shutter in finer steps but not stepless. Shutter speed longer than 1 sec isn't important to me as I can time those by hand accurately with the help of a watch.
 

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
I owned a plain prism F for a long time, and years later bought an F2AS. The F2AS never resonated with me. I think the difference was the prism, the metered head Nikons look Frankenstein and are top heavy. If unmetered versions of either weren't so expensive I'd give them another go, but the market has spoken and it said plain prism pro-Nikons are the aesthetic preference.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,236
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I owned a plain prism F for a long time, and years later bought an F2AS. The F2AS never resonated with me. I think the difference was the prism, the metered head Nikons look Frankenstein and are top heavy. If unmetered versions of either weren't so expensive I'd give them another go, but the market has spoken and it said plain prism pro-Nikons are the aesthetic preference.
F3s are cheap and plentiful in mint condition, lovely lighter weight camera. Put new silver oxide batteries in every year . And the meter is in the body so no gianormous photomic finders. Nikon made a beautiful (Cordovan?) burgundy , leather case for the F3, the bottom half attaches similar to the popular Leica style half cases.
This is a good discussion, I need to get rid of some of these antiques ,all I shoot is medium format and occasionally my F5 for slides. I found a youngster that I hooked up with 2 of my surplus Beseler 4x5 enlargers, and sundries for 100 bucks. He was so happy. I still have 4 ha!
Best Regards Mike
 

Scott Micciche

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
312
Location
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Format
Multi Format
F3s are cheap and plentiful in mint condition, lovely lighter weight camera. Put new silver oxide batteries in every year . And the meter is in the body so no gianormous photomic finders. Nikon made a beautiful (Cordovan?) burgundy , leather case for the F3, the bottom half attaches similar to the popular Leica style half cases.
This is a good discussion, I need to get rid of some of these antiques ,all I shoot is medium format and occasionally my F5 for slides. I found a youngster that I hooked up with 2 of my surplus Beseler 4x5 enlargers, and sundries for 100 bucks. He was so happy. I still have 4 ha!
Best Regards Mike

Good cases keep the cameras functioning like new. Even though I don't have an F3, I liked the smallish grip so I had this one made by Luigi.

41478601074_032b1745ca_z.jpg
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,492
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
F2S with MD-1 and MB-1:

IMAG7030-1.jpg
 

Ap507b

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2008
Messages
184
Location
Surrey, UK
Format
35mm
Have an F eyelevel & a few F2's. As nice as the F is to shoot with the F2 feels more polished when shooting.

Never thought of it as a pimp camera. Anyone know where I can get some leopard skin print replacement leatherette for one? Lol.

F2's are the favourites of all my Nikon' to shoot with.
 

Scott Micciche

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2017
Messages
312
Location
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Format
Multi Format
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom