Nikkor 45mm f2.8 P Pancake lens

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm

The Nikon site has an article about the AI Nikkor 45mm f/2.8P -> A Standard Pancake Lens for the Nikon FM3A

Fuji 100-10-17B by Les DMess, on Flickr

I am still on the hunt for one myself . . .
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
Why would you want this lens over a Series E 50/1.8? The 50 is also very small and light, plus 1.5 stops faster. I can't see the use of a standard lens that is only F2.8.
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,412
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Why would you want this lens over a Series E 50/1.8? The 50 is also very small and light, plus 1.5 stops faster. I can't see the use of a standard lens that is only F2.8.

I find 50mm a little too narrow. The sweet spot for me is really 35mm/40mm. Perhaps I'll be happy with this 45mm, too. Also, I never use my prime lenses wide open, I tend to stop them down to f/4 or f/5.6.

I guess what I'm really looking for is the thinnest profile SLR+lens I can find to replace a 'point and shoot' compact camera use case.

There is that, and then there is obviously GAS
 
Last edited:

ooze

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2004
Messages
428
Location
Istanbul/Düsseldorf
Format
Multi Format
The Nikon site has an article about the AI Nikkor 45mm f/2.8P -> A Standard Pancake Lens for the Nikon FM3A

Fuji 100-10-17B by Les DMess, on Flickr

I am still on the hunt for one myself . . .

Interesting article from the designer. Towards the end he writes: "The FM3A was discontinued because it turned out to be very difficult to achieve compliance with the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive (RoHS 1) adopted by the EU in 2003". I wonder what hazardous material the FM3A contained considering that the directive is aimed at minimising waste from electrical and electronic equipment.
Sad that a lens as sweet as the 45mm/2.8P had such a short life.
 

M-88

Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
1,023
Location
Georgia
Format
Multi Format

There's also Series E 35 mm f/2.8 which may not be as fast as 50/1.8, but is fairly wider and cheaper than 45/2.8. Not too big/heavy either.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
I have earlier version. Small size makes my Nikon F close to pocketable. Satisfied with results.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm

Then consider the Pentax MX + pancake lens combination . . .

Size Lineup by Les DMess, on Flickr
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm

In a previous company one of the most common ROHS issue was hexavalent chromium which is likely in everything metallic prior to this.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2023
Messages
187
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Format
35mm
I have never used the newer version, but I also have the old 45 GN lens, an early one with the nine-blade iris.

My parents got it in 1969 for its original purpose, working with manual flashguns. And I actually used it that way a few times, including shooting a wedding and bar mitzvah... until we got a Vivitar 283.

It's my most-used Nikkor lens. I kept it mounted on a Nikon F2 (with plain DE-1 prism) for over a decade: the lightest possible F2 configuration to carry around. And I've never had any complaints with its sharpness or imaging:



These days I use my other Nikkor non-AI lenses more frequently - the 105/2.5, 135/3.5, 35/2, etc. - but I often bring the 45 GN along as an alternative to the long lenses, since it's essentially effortless to carry.

Addendum: Note that there's also a Thousand and One Nights article about the 45 GN:

 
Last edited:

Kodachromeguy

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
2,054
Location
Olympia, Washington
Format
Multi Format
Is this 45mm GN one of the last Tessar-type lenses ever designed in the approx. 50mm focal length? Have there been any newer ones from any company? Most the others I can think of are 1950s. The Contarex Tessar ƒ/2.8 was from 1960.
 
Last edited:

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,405
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid

One of the major effects of RoHS was the move to lead free solder, which caused major changes to how electronic equipment is assembled. Obviously Nikon has managed to figure this out for other cameras with more electronics, but it is possible that reconfiguring the electronics assembly for the FM3A, a low volume item with an uncertain future that was probably assembled partly by hand, was too much of a hassle or just made it unprofitable.

Another possibility is that it had to do with the body finishing and plating, which might have involved regulated heavy metals as suggested by another poster. Or it might have been that the FM3A had a separate assembly line requiring separate certification that was expensive. I suspect all of these come down to that if they were selling hundreds of thousands of them, it would have been doable, but less so for a low volume product.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,405
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid

Trivia: the N6006 has a built-in flash and will meter with AI, non-chipped lenses, but not a non-AI lens. (On the digital side, the D200/D300 series and the D7000-D7200 series also have built-in flash and can meter with manual focus AI lenses.) Typically among the film AF cameras, the built-in flash came on more "amateur" oriented bodies like N65, N75, N80, etc, and Nikon started leaving the mechanical AI meter coupling off those to save money; usually they were aimed at being used with an AF kit lens anyway. The one weakness of an N80/F80, lack of metering with manual focus lenses.
 

KinoGrafx

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
138
Format
Large Format

To add to this, the n6006 won’t even mount non-ai lenses, and doesn’t do balanced fill flash with ai/ais lenses. But It’ll do ttl flash and center weighted and spot metering with ai/ais but not matrix. And most of all they are great, under appreciated grossly undervalued cameras! So much fun to use
 

KinoGrafx

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
138
Format
Large Format
Oops, so a 45mm f2.8 gn ai or ais would work great on a n6006. Back on track…
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,412
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
The lens is here. It's tiny. Even smaller than I had imagined. Smaller and lighter than my Voigtländer 40mm f/2. Very well dampened focus ring, nice click to the aperture ring. Came with a 'barnacle' hood and caps.

Couple of pictures, including a comparison with a 50mm f/1.8 Ai-s pancake.

Ready to try it out. Roll of Kentmere 400, light yellow filter, D23 1+1 just mixed. Life is good!




 
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
982
Location
USA
Format
Traditional

Slick as hell. No glamour shots with the hood?

The other Nikkor pancakes, apart from the GN & AI-P, are the 10mm CX & 26mm Z with flange distances of 17mm and 16mm respectively.
 

images39

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
513
Location
Reno, NV
Format
Medium Format
The 45mm 2.8P is my most used lens for 35mm. I've read online reviews both trashing it and praising it, and none of that matters... I love the results from this lens. Also makes a Nikon SLR nice and compact. I think you'll like it.

Dale
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The 45mm 2.8P is my most used lens for 35mm. I've read online reviews both trashing it and praising it, and none of that matters... I love the results from this lens. Also makes a Nikon SLR nice and compact. I think you'll like it.

Dale

Either one likes the slightly wider than normal lens or not. It is a religious following, like which end of a hard boiled egg one opens first.
 

images39

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
513
Location
Reno, NV
Format
Medium Format
Either one likes the slightly wider than normal lens or not. It is a religious following, like which end of a hard boiled egg one opens first.

It's nothing religious on my part, I just think the 45mm focal length is versatile, and like the image quality from this lens. The OP had asked for feedback on it.

Dale
 

albireo

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
1,412
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format

A blogger, James Tocchio, posted a review of the F301 + 45mm f/2.8P combo, which is the exact one I shared pictures of a few months ago in this thread. What a fantastic coincidence! Hey James Tocchio! How about acknowledging you got inspiration from here in your blog so Photrio gets some traffic?

For everyone else - if you want a 45mm f/2.8P get it now - the bloggers are on it (next will be the youtubers). I anticipate a 100% markup within 1 year.
 

M-88

Member
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
1,023
Location
Georgia
Format
Multi Format
Hey James Tocchio! How about acknowledging you got inspiration from here in your blog so Photrio gets some traffic?
Pff. Tht blog went downhill around a year ago. Guess they've run out of stuff to review. Photrio member Huss was a frequent guest of comment section there.
 

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
494
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Now that everything is said but not yet by me I also had this lens for just a short period of time as I could not find any benefit in it beside being "not so special". Not sharp in comparison, no interesting characteristics whatsoever. Just the boring Tessar-signature to be had from about any decent 60s snapshooter.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…