Nice to see Kate taking over photo patronage

Ballinderry-Michael

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
315
Location
Co. Antrim, Ireland
Format
35mm RF
I thought the honorary membership a couple of years ago was a bit inappropriate; but the patronage is normal (by UK standards, at any rate) and was to be expected, eventually.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I am glad that someone is carrying the photographic standard.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,964
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
What can the lad be looking at on the back of the camera? Maybe in that rectangle built on the back of the camera is the end of the film package to tell him which film he has loaded? There's not a lot else to look at on the door to the film compartment, is there?

Hang on a minute! It might just be... the speaker slumps forward to reveal a nine inch bayonet in his back. What the lad was looking at will take Marlowe the next 250 pages to work out in the new version of The Big Sleep

pentaxuser
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Well, I was not aware of the Royal Photographic Society before (and I guess Eric was not either...). And in this respect that change in patronage and the resulting media awareness is a good thing...

But if I understand it correcetly this thread is not about the RPS and the new patronage, but about the photographer Kate Middleton.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
pentaxuser said:
...
Hang on a minute! It might just be... the speaker slumps forward to reveal a nine inch bayonet in his back. What the lad was looking at will take Marlowe the next 250 pages to work out in the new version of The Big Sleep
...
Click to expand...

I'm an avid Raymond Chandler reader; I have all his novels. Eagerly awaiting The Big Sleep II, especially if it involves cameras...
 
  • jtk
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • awty
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
The Queen was active with filming when she was+much younger and in fact before she became+the Queen
 

cowanw

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Hamilton, On
Format
Large Format
For those interested.
I had trouble finding the list of Royal Patronage between Victoria and Elizabeth, so I wrote the RPS and got back this.
May 30 1853 -1901 Victoria
May 30 1853 to 1861 Prince Albert
Jan 1863 Edward, the Prince of Wales
1902 Edward Vll and Queen Alexandra and Vice Patrons George and Mary, the Prince and Princess of Wales
1911-1936 King George V
1920 Edward, the Prince of Wales
1936 Edward Vlll
1937 George Vl
June 3 1952-June 25, 2019 Elizabeth ll
June 26,2019 The Duchess of Cambridge
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
ann said:
The Queen was active with filming when she was+much younger and in fact before she became+the Queen
Click to expand...
Also Queen Elizabeth II was frequently seen and photographed using a Leica. There seems to have always been a close relationship between her and the RPS.......Regards!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
But the queen not yet had her work exhibitioned or published as book.
In contrast to her relative, late king of Belgium Leopold III.
 

ann

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
So what does that have to do with anything. She enjoyed making images which is important.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
What has patronage by a royal person to do with photography?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
And what means does Kate have other than the glamour factor, by that attracting the media?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,976
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Royal patronage is/was the prototype of what is now referred to as an "influencer" - without any need to log into Twitter.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
The Duchess of Cambridge is a beautiful elegant lady, who as a member I'm happy to have as a patron of R.P.S.
 
OP
OP

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,843
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
AgX said:
And what means does Kate have other than the glamour factor, by that attracting the media?
Click to expand...
I think your attitude is coloured more by your distaste for all things "royal" more than anything else. So I suggest you just call a spade a spade and not dance around the edges.
 

cowanw

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Hamilton, On
Format
Large Format
In fairness, that is the point. Royal Patronage adds exposure and cachet and approval. Victoria was a collector, not a photographer. As far as I know neither Edward Vll, George V, Edward Vlll, nor George Vl were particularly known as Photographers. Although Edward Vll's Queen, Alexandra, was.
What is interesting is that this is the first time the patron has not been the ruling monarch or the Price of Wales. By bypassing Charles, a published photographer, (and William) the Family is showing its marketing skills at remaining as relevant as it can be.
 

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
As a member of the RPS, I first learned of it when the recent magazine issue showed up... of course they had a big article on her new patronage.

Pretty cool stuff.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,989
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
nmp said:
Queen consort, not Queen, apparently. I don't know how she will be addressed though.
Click to expand...

I believe the Queen Mum was also Queen Consort to George VI. Addressed as your majesty or ma'am.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
nmp said:
Queen consort, not Queen, apparently. I don't know how she will be addressed though.
Click to expand...

Not really a problem for me while I was in the same room as Prince Charles years ago, the opportunity for me to speak to Kate is quite remote.
 

cowanw

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
2,236
Location
Hamilton, On
Format
Large Format
Queen Consorts and Queen Regnants and Dowager Queens are all subsets of Queens and are all referred to as Queen. The Queen Mum was "Queen Elizabeth" until George Vl died and then became "Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother".
 
  • jtk
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • Eric Rose
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • Frank53
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • awty
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • c41
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
  • Eric Rose
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Off topic
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…