New Versions:Kodak Professional Portra 400NC and 400VC films

Fotogeorge

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
28
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Medium Format
FYI:

NEWSLINE: Professional Markets Monday, January 07, 2008

Kodak introduces improved versions of Kodak Professional Portra 400-speed color negative films

Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester , N.Y. , is offering improved versions of its Kodak Professional Portra 400NC and 400VC films. The enhancements build on the introduction of improved Portra films in 2006. The finer grain of the Portra 400NC and 400VC films, combined with the spectacular skin tone of the entire portfolio, enable professional photographers to create striking photographs, says Kodak. The technology innovations also result in better scanning, the company adds. The new Kodak Professional Portra films will be available worldwide on a stock-turnover basis beginning in the first quarter of this year.
©Photo Marketing Association International
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Last edited by a moderator:

copake_ham

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
4,091
Location
NYC or Copak
Format
35mm
Very good news indeed, although it seems as if we need a "scorecard" to keep track of all the Portra revisions!

Nonetheless, I'm happy anytime there is a new or improved film being introduced. Much better than the opposite kind of news.
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
The edge markings should be help enough for now:

Original Portra: 160NC, 160VC, 400NC, 400VC, 800
1st Update: 160NC-2, 160VC-2, 400NC-2, 400VC-2, 800-2
2nd Update: 400NC-3, 400VC-3

What I find really interesting is that the ISO 400 is the first one to get the bump. I'm not surprised because it's such a beautiful film for all situations, with nonexistent grain, that I can't even see the difference from the 160 at 11x14 printed on RA-4.
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
This is great news.
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
I thought it was pretty impressive in the "old and unimproved" formulation.
 

Christiaan Phleger

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,213
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
Wow, seriously surprised and very stoked we got an upgrade so quick. 400VC is my staple, and I'm sure glad they improved it again so fast rather than waiting. When I'm busy I can do 50-70 rolls a month, and the newer version was a great improvement over my previous film, 400UC. So, when is the 'No Grain' version going to be released?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
As I said before, Kodak has a dedicated team to both B&W and color film improvement. Since the teams are smaller, the improvements come along more slowly but it is taking place.

PE
 

copake_ham

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
4,091
Location
NYC or Copak
Format
35mm

If you re-read the OP and check out K's site - they have already been released - but availability is subject to vendor stock out of the "older" version.


Photo Engineer said:
As I said before, Kodak has a dedicated team to both B&W and color film improvement. Since the teams are smaller, the improvements come along more slowly but it is taking place.

PE
Click to expand...

Ron,

You're being modest for your former colleagues. To come out with a new version of 400 NC/VC just one year after that last "new" version is "fast" not slow!

And I suspect, you know that!

I do hope that the film folk at K come to visit this site soon - perhaps in a "controlled" format so we can ask some serious questions without a lot of negativity.

Now, I wonder what they have in store for 160 and 800?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
George;

When I was still there, they would have had maybe 9 teams. Ones on 160NC, 160VC, 160UC, 400NC, 400VC, 400UC and so on. You get the picture. Then they would all have been released at one time! So, to me the pace is slower.

PE
 

wildbill

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
2,828
Location
Grand Rapids
Format
Multi Format
Speaking of 400UC. I've only shot one roll of 120 400UC on a seagull tlr i was given to fix. They were family shots and I had it developed and printed at A&I. The color was outstanding. How long was this film around and why did it get axed? Is 400VC close?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Bill;

I wish I knew the answers. I have not made a direct comparison. I used VC films almost exclusively.

PE
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

I wish I knew.

I have not used the 120 VC 400 that I have yet so I can't say.

When I heard that 120 UC400 was being discontinued I rushed to Samys and brought every roll they had (55 rolls) so that I could keep the film from the hoarders.

I wish that I had done the same with 120 HIE, but APUG had not gotten to me at that time. Since then APUG got to me and I process my black and white film.

Steve
 

Christiaan Phleger

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,213
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
Actually, I was joking, the "No Grain" comment was that each new versions has 'even finer grain' so when does it disappear completely.

I still have a few pro-packs of 100 and 400 UC in 120, saving them for another decade so I can rant about how good it was way back when in the 'aughts...
 

Tim Gray

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
1,882
Location
OH
Format
35mm
I'm mostly a B&W guy, but I've used some of the 160NC/VC-2. I never did get around to ordering any of the version 2 400 films (local stores don't carry it). Heck, I guess I'll just have to try 400NC-3 now...
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
RidingWaves said:
I still have a few pro-packs of 100 and 400 UC in 120, saving them for another decade so I can rant about how good it was way back when in the 'aughts...
Click to expand...

RAOFLMAO - These youngens, it was afore their time, but I 'member back when gas was $3.00 per gallon!

Steve
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format


You will never get zero grain.

I did coatings of cast dyes which were pure dye molecules in gelatin. We measured them and they showed measurable grain. It gets down to the noise in the system.

PE
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Photo Engineer said:
You will never get zero grain.

I did coatings of cast dyes which were pure dye molecules in gelatin. We measured them and they showed measurable grain. It gets down to the noise in the system.

PE
Click to expand...

Can you say what kind of enlargement would be necessary to have visible grain clumping?
 

Silverhead

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
275
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Plastic Cameras
I'm just curious to see if Kodak can get its grain down to the same level as Fuji Provia 400X...which is quite frankly, incredible for a 400 ISO film. Obviously, being a negative film, the Portra won't be able to match the color saturation of the Provia, but if the grain is small enough then it could turn into a really sweet all-purpose portrait film.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
mhv said:
Can you say what kind of enlargement would be necessary to have visible grain clumping?
Click to expand...

Well, with the cast dye coatings, there was no 'clumping' as such. At worst, since these were sulfonic acid azo dyes, the dye would form a micelle in gelatin + water and you might be able to see that, but I think in this case we were looking at noise in the system.

As far as regular films, I have enlargements up to 16x20 from 35mm and they are remarkably clear of clumping. You can see some grain, but not what I would class as the traditional clumping I saw in films from the 50s and 60s.

However, I have a 16x20 of a blue swimming pool on Kodacolor X from the 60 and even with that uniform color, you cannot see clumping. So, it varies.

I hope that answers your question.

PE
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Thanks PE, that gives me an idea. I enlarged Portra 400NC 35mm on Supra Endura, and I was amazed not to see grain at all. I can't enlarge bigger with my current setup, but that's already quite impressive. And the shadow detail was great: my subject had a black shirt with slight bits of shiny thread that you can see just clearly enough.
 

GGardner

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
32
Format
Medium Format
It seems unfortunate that Kodak would bring us this great new film, but the only place we can see it is on their tiny image gallery. These 300x300 (?) images from medium format film don't really tell us much about the product.
 

Snapshot

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I, for one, am quite happy for the release of the new Portra film. I can't wait to try out the 400VC. The 400NC long roll looks interesting well.
 

Alex Bishop-Thorpe

Advertiser
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
1,451
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Format
Multi Format
Portra film's been on my to-do list for a long while, and this is fantastic news - between this and the new T-Max it seems film development is still a very worthy aspiration for Kodak. We need some encouragement now and then from ol' yella.
Who knows, Fuji may counter this development with their own, they seemed to play off each other historically.
 

Neanderman

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Messages
565
Location
Ohio River Valley
Format
Large Format
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…