I got good results with it using FP4 at 250 and HP5 at 640.
FP4:
HP5:
David Allen's link is now over 4 years old and clicking on it gives me the usual 404 error. I had a look at Nik and Trícks website and can find no mention of this developer which appears to be diafine based
The 2 bath developer now stocked seems to be Thornton's. So what's this developer actually called that Freestyle now stocks and is it linked to what David Allen linked to which appeared to be Diafine based?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Excellent images
Thanks, foc I wonder what real connectíon it has the Diafine. The description of it on that level is somewhat vague and crucially what does it do that none of the current speed increasing developers such as microphen do?
pentaxuser
Thanks, foc I wonder what real connectíon it has the Diafine. The description of it on that level is somewhat vague and crucially what does it do that none of the current speed increasing developers such as microphen do?
pentaxuser
"Higher contrast situations can be mellowed by lowering the film speed if desired" I didn't know it was this simple!
Neither did I Can anybody else help here on what seems to be a statement that lowering film speed is all that is needed to "mellow" contrast
Is the word "mellow" as opposed to the word "lower" deliberately chosen because lowering film speed does not lower contrast per se in what is the usual understanding of lowering contrast?
In a high contrast scene lowering film speed works but it has to be combined with less development to lower contrast, doesn't it? Henry Horenstein in his book "Beyond Basic Photography" has a good example of this with 2 identical scenes
pentaxuser
They’re simply repeating the conventional wisdom which is that you give a little extra exposure when you plan to develop the film to a lower-than-normal contrast. Same type of thing that’s in the Zone System etc. and it’s not anything particular to two-bath developers.
So they are right in stating that doing nothing else other than lowering film speed will reduce contrast? Will this be to an extent that makes it meaningful in terms of print quality?
pentaxuser
As it is a two-bath developer, the contrast/development inter-relationship may be a bit unusual.
Increased exposure can reduce contrast, if the increase is sufficient to drive the image up into the top part of the curve.
What kind of increase in exposure is required( 1/2 stop; 1 etc) and what is sacrificed in the resultant outcome, Matt?
Thanks
pentaxuser
The FP4 one is beautiful.Thanks for the comment. I should say that looking at my notes the HP5 image is 35mm, the FP4 one is 645 format.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?