Fortunately, all three of those make a variety of excellent papers.Ilford, Foma, and Bergger
For the right subject Ilfords Art 300, which is a photo rag art paper, is unbeatable, a lovely paper for still life, portraits and some landscapes, also the Ilford MG Classic FB paper is a very very good paper, and when it come back the Adox MCC or MCP, the first is FB and the second is RC paper are well worth trying.
Richard
Exactly, I would begin with a simpler approach. Have myself only printed for a couple years but was lucky to have a pile of Ilford MGIV RC from my camera club membership and gotten to print a lot with it. Ilford overall is great and gives fantastic results plus I do not feel they will take away any of their products -- they are commited.Your post says you're new to wet printing. How much experience do you have? Have you done much dodging, burning, or worked with contrast filters?
PS- I don't know why this is posted in the color forum. You may get more responses in the B&W forum.
Most of the "must try" papers are already gone, and we're left with the "must use" papers. The one you "must try" would be Polywarmtone, if it's comeback many years in the making ever actually occurs. Could happen in the next year, we'll see. Many people love the Ilford papers, I've never tried the other European offerings but I'd like to.
I've seen this pop up a few times now. What is Polywarmtone and why is it so anticipated?
Exactly.Wet printing is not ink jet printing. Get any known brand and practice until it comes out right. Only then you may see subjective element of different makes.
-Ilford Multigrade V Satin 8x10 (probably better than the expired RC paper I currently have)
-Fomabrom 112 Variant III VC FB Matte 8x10 (Curious how matte darkroom paper compares to the matte cotton rag inkjet paper I love printing on. I don't know how this stuff should tone)
as I said, it works beautifully for some subjects, not all, I does retain detail, but, but it is an art paper, almost like a cartridge drawing paper, and is a warm paper, for portraits and still life it is beautiful, for some landscapes and seascapes it works well, it is almost dead mat, and tones beautifully is sepia,I did a series of prints of a Victorian Christmas on it a couple of years and the look of this paper was perfect, as faras beeing similer to the cotton rag inkjet paper, I couldn't tell you as I have never used inkjet, I only ever have wet printed, it is expensive, and triple weight, in the size I use, 9 1/2 by 12 you only get 30 sheets pwer box rathe than 50, it is to thick to get 50 in, best thing is to get a pack and try it, choose the right subject and it is unbeatableI've read in one post that the Art 300 doesn't retain detail well so it doesn't work well for some subjects. How true is that? Is the cotton rag nature of this paper similar to inkjet paper in texture?
That's odd. I have printed on MCC110, MCC112, MCP310, MCP312, and Adox Variotone, with not a single defect across hundreds of sheets.I also used Adox fibre based but it was not reliable, all kinds of errors and light leaks.
Yeah, could be coincidence. Anyway, we have to wait now, because there aren’t any Adox papers availableThat's odd. I have printed on MCC110, MCC112, MCP310, MCP312, and Adox Variotone, with not a single defect across hundreds of sheets.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?