New (to me) Leica R5 with 50mm and 135mm lenses

WPPD25 Self Portrait

A
WPPD25 Self Portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 23
Wife

A
Wife

  • 4
  • 1
  • 72
Dragon IV 10.jpg

A
Dragon IV 10.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 78
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

A
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 47

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,880
Messages
2,766,342
Members
99,495
Latest member
Brenva1A
Recent bookmarks
0

RezaLoghme

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
896
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Hello, 35mm friends,

a brief self-introdcution! I have recently bought a (black) Leica R5, including a 50mm Summicron-R (Made in Canada, R-only) and a 135mm Elmarit, complete with all front and rear lens covers.

So far, the whole kits seems to be in sound condition; I have removed some dust and cleaned everything a bit. A dry run revealed some irregular shutter lag (I am aware of the general problem, but my camera seems to display a somewhat erratic behaviour in that respect), but repeated firing of the shutter seemed to have cured the matter somewhat. The seller (professional vintage Leica dealer) was friendly and offered to take it back if I wanted him to.

First impressions: a somewhat typical 1980s 35mm SLR. Of course, the logo and the red dot might suggest that this camera is something special, but, compared to the current Ms which I had a closer look at in our local Leica boutique, it is quite an ordinary camera (not in a bad way). Compared to the R7, 8 or 9, to the SL range and to many others, it is quite compact. It is a camera which I am going to use, carry with me, bang around, maybe drop or even lose. The white logo has become yellow-ish, the leatherette seems ok, all functions seem to work as they should, only the plastic film transport lever is a bit of a disappointment, it simply looks a bit cheap. On the other hands it is quite impressive in what a good the camera is, given its age.

I went to the Leica boutique to "upgrade" the camera with an original Leica hipster-ish rope-type camera strap (which cost 1/3 of the entire body of the camera) and so far I am a happy man. I look like one of those Influencers but on a shoestring budget.

I do not expect any wonders; it is a 40 year old kit, and it is not the camera but the photographer who "makes" (not "takes" - A.A.) the photo. Still, handling the camera makes me happy, and while it is not a MP, or M6, or M3, it is a nice camera made by an important manufacturer, and I picked up the whole kit for the price of 1/2 Iphone. What's not to like?

I would be happy to update you about my progress and also answer any questions.
IMG_3287.jpeg
 

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,575
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I've never had an R5, but I have an R4 -- kinda, sorta. I have a Minolta XD-11 which is basically the same camera (http://www.subclub.org/minman/leica.htm). Sure, it's 40 years old, but works great. Happy shooting. The R5 is more reliable than the R4, and has a "souped-up" shutter speed range.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
896
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Thank you!
It is a nice camera and while the body surely looks a bit "period", the lenses are quite timeless and shockingly modern. Like the Hasselblad V-System, the size is nicely compact, and I am curious how my first roll of film is going to pan out.
And I am planning to have it CLA'd.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
896
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Nobody else?

I mean I could try the "Leica Rs were just re-badged Minoltas" bait...:smile:
 

Mark J

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
438
Location
Denbigh, North Wales UK
Format
Multi Format
Lucky if you can get it 'CLA'd' ! ( ed. sorry, 'serviced' - that's English )
I don't really want to contribute to an argument about why / why not Leica's are good, if that's what you're seeking ; I own both Minolta and Leica.
 
Last edited:

Mark Crabtree

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
782
Format
Large Format
I switched from Nikon to Leica slr at one time because I preferred the lenses. I didn't have the budget to replace my Nikkor 180/2.8 with the Leica equivalent so got the 135/2.8, which was very cheap at the time. That turned out to be a favorite lens and the focal length ended up being more useful for what I was doing at the time. I had the same 50 as you and that was great. The 35 Summicron was amazing in a kind of over the top way. Zingy. Mike Johnston (The Online Photographer) had similar comments on that lens I think; I can't recall if it ended up at the absolute top of his old favorite 35mm list or not.

I don't think I could exactly say it was my favorite of the whole system, but the 90 Summicron was the lens that I miss the most. I dropped mine in a hurried lens swap and couldn't get it fixed. I was talked into the "better" 90 Elmarit; that was a very sharp lens but I never warmed up to it for people shots like the Summicron. I never found a similar focal length lens I liked at much on another slr, though the 85/1.8 Rokkor was pretty satisfying.

People's tastes differ wildly and the lenses I disliked most on the Nikon a extremely popular. I've now got a bunch of old F to F3 vintage Nikon gear and have found the lenses I like best in that line. But I still miss that 90 Summicron.
 

Mark J

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2023
Messages
438
Location
Denbigh, North Wales UK
Format
Multi Format
I have a few Leica bodies ( R4s, had an R-E, two R7's ) . I moved from Minolta XD7 to Leica for the lenses, and because the bodies had a lot of commonality. I have a bunch of lenses, mostly later ones. They are great bodies and not too complex. Extra build quality vs. Minolta. The switches and dials are more positive and durable. I loved the R7's because of the half-stop shutter dial, but both of mine now have problems after 25 years of use.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
896
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
I also think the whole system is valued at a quite attractive price level, compared to what they were new.
I only partly understand the M series fetish; I tried a few M3-M4 but the only one that really caught my love was the M-A/MP.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
896
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
I don't think I could exactly say it was my favorite of the whole system, but the 90 Summicron was the lens that I miss the most. I dropped mine in a hurried lens swap and couldn't get it fixed. I was talked into the "better" 90 Elmarit; that was a very sharp lens but I never warmed up to it for people shots like the Summicron.
Interesting!!
Well, I have enough gear.
Have I?
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,926
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
What's your use case for the 90mm?

I find it to be a great reportage lens. A few snaps with Summicron R 90, film was XP2 SUPER, home developed, Ilford RC prints:

1712927947928.png


1712927988162.png


1712928017124.png


1712928041468.png


Carbon printing WS with Borut Peterlin (TOPSHIT PHOTOGRAPHY).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom