• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

new to forum, could please use some help

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,886
Messages
2,847,069
Members
101,529
Latest member
Flo18
Recent bookmarks
0
Well perhaps if you have never heard it before then you're not as well informed or smart as you think you are. This is illustrated by the fact that the quote has the authors name at the end of it but in your ignorance you have ignored that.

Then if Michael Gudzinowicz quoted it, it must be correct:D
 
Well perhaps if you have never heard it before then you're not as well informed or smart as you think you are. This is illustrated by the fact that the quote has the authors name at the end of it but in your ignorance you have ignored that.

I repeat.
 
and agitated with inversion 5s/30s. also went straight to stop after dev instead of water in between

attachment.php


THANKS APUG COMMUNITY
 

Attachments

  • yay.jpg
    yay.jpg
    377.1 KB · Views: 232
But he has a better process than he had before. Go forth and do good things.
 
We often hear that a stopbath is needed to stop development immediately. The difference between a water rinse and a stopbath is negligible compared to the total development time. A stopbath is only really needed for FB papers which have a larger carryover into the fix. This is done only to protect the fixer pH and no other reason.
 
i understand the value in only changing one thing at a time to hone in on specific errors.
i dont think i changed so many things as to be left unsure as to what i was previously doing incorrectly. burping my tank, for example, wasnt my savior. or adding more developer. my real changes in process were agitation technique/time, and using stop right away instead of water then stop after developing. out of those two changes, my previous negative didnt show signs of developer not being stopped in a timely fashion, so i feel comfortable ruling that out as the difference. what worked was changing my agitation technique. maybe i should have stuck with 10s per min agitation though. ill go back to that. besides, i can get more little things done with 50 seconds than i can with 25 :D

thanks sirius!

gerald i wasnt using stop pervious to running into an agitation issue and negatives came out fine. ill probably return to water only after the chemical runs out and see what happens.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom