No one said it was technically impossible, so you're trying to dispel a non-existent myth. If it were impossible, it wouldn't have been created in the first place.
It is infeasible, impractical and improbable-- It makes no sense from a technical, financial or ecological point of view.
+0.5.
Financially it wouldn’t make much sense in the classic shortsighted capitalistic goal sense.
Technically some parts of Kodachrome would make very good sense.
The ability to freely choose long lasting and perfect dyes and do complete colour separations for instance, would be wonderful.
The ecological thing is just pure BS used as quick virtue signaling cop-out by Kodak, and latched onto by third rung social currency scavengers.
+0.5.
Technically some parts of Kodachrome would make very good sense.
The ability to freely choose long lasting and perfect dyes and do complete colour separations for instance, would be wonderful.
That will never happen either. For one thing, hazmat restrictions are a lot more stringent than three decades ago. And there is already a worthy substitute for Ciba, even better in certain respects, which is Fujiflex Supergloss.
And one lab will be enough. A couple of years before discontinuation all rolls were developed by just one lab in US, not a surprise taking into account that Kodachrome represented about 1% of total Kodak's film sales according to company statement.