When, pray tell, was Sandy's credibility or expertise questioned by his peers?
From all I can tell, he has shared his knowledge freely and accurately, both of successes and of failures.
You see, I do not pick sides on this. I'm looking for a future reference. We're talking here about handbook of developers and their effect on negative and print for various development and print processes. It was never published before. Not in a complex document or book. I think Sandy's proposal undertake these testing is an excellent idea. The conclusion based on these comparisons would be crucial to credibility of the information how these findings would be published.
Personally, I would be very interested to see some book at the end as a general guideline for developers. As I said, Sandy, who founded Pyrocat-HD and many of us, including me, are using, has its oposition who whenever was possible, questioned Sandy's HD and some test results as well. There is a certain bias involved, I'm not saying Sandy is biased, but it can be perceived as there would be. Especially, if HD would be concluded as favorite with other developers. This is Sandy's achilles all the time, HD is good, very good, unfortunately not everybody agrees. I would suggest to gather opinions from other very qualified photographers, and choosing very carefuly methods of testing and method of comparison.
Again Sandy, good luck with your testing I would be very interested in your results.
p.s. With respect to codes, .---- ---., if you type PMK vs. Pyrocat, either here or lf.info you would get the idea what I'm talking about.