Don't forget that Kodak sold or leased a number of older formulas to China for film production. Could it be that they are the source?
PE
Entirely feasible. Some of the Lomography 100 CN 120 films that I have are "made in China".
Additionally hasn't Kodak pretty much stated that it's current "Color Plus" product is in fact Kodacolor 200 VR as sold in the late 90s? It certainly performs as such.
From the grain structure and colour palette, there is absolutely no way that the Lomography branded films are Kodak Gold or closely related.
Found out about the more recent 'VR' materials - specifically a quote from a Kodak representative in Germany who described the VR films as a Kodak Gold/ Farbwelt variant with the following characteristics: "... the VR films are balanced more moderately in regard to contrast and saturation. This has been done with regard to the universal fields of application."
Why couldnt they bring back Kodachrome 10? That was photography!
Don't forget that Kodak sold or leased a number of older formulas to China for film production. Could it be that they are the source?
Lucky Film cancelled production of their colour films some years ago. What of course does not exclude toll-production.
For the film in question basically two origins are likely
-) being a erroneous malproduction, marketed now by Lomography
-) purposely applying production deficiencies, as PE indicated
With any tollproduction one must have economics in mind. If production of film with deficiencies is as as costly as a regular prpduction, is it worth for Lomography to produce it for those who want something off? Only Lomography know.
If even it was erroneous malproduction, who would have produced it? I wonder if the backing paper will tell us anything about it.
As I tried to indicate in post #2 all speaks against a new film.
That is completely wrong.
It is a new film!
I assume other fellows are getting tired of such bickering...
Still you are calling assumptions of mine misinformation.
Strange enough you do not do so towards PE who uttered similar assumption.
Additionally hasn't Kodak pretty much stated that it's current "Color Plus" product is in fact Kodacolor 200 VR as sold in the late 90s? It certainly performs as such.
Well more than a month has passed since you corrected all the speculation. So it is a new film and you have been to the factory and spoken to the engineers.That is completely wrong.
It is a new film!
I've visited the factory and talked to the engineers who have designed it.
That is all I am allowed to say. No further details from me because of an NDA.
Best regards,
Henning
Can we also assume that these engineers are highly experienced photo engineers?
If you can add nothing to what you already said above can you indicate the likely schedule of production and what stage the whole project is at.
These NDAs certainly get in the way of telling us much. A great pity
+1
I thought someone was doing a remake of Metropolis (1927) or a live action of the 2001 anime.
Yes, of course they are. With lots of years of experience in making colour films. You need that experience to make such a film. It would be impossible for a young start-up to produce colour film (or any film at all, but colour film is of course much much more difficult to produce than BW film).
The factory is also very modern and equipped with state-of-the-art technology. This film is just one part of a silver-halide product portfolio of many different products.
Best regards,
Henning
Thanks so I take it that these experienced engineers and modern factory belong to a company other than Lomography. It is one from a group of factories that already exist for the production of film. The factory is not owned or financed by Lomography but Lomography has paid and commissioned the production of such a film to its own specifications?
pentaxuser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?