I live in NoVA now and the area is full of old family cemeteries from the 1700s onward, so your comments about gravestone photography caught my attention.
I understand your point, although I'd argue that (1) is not really a relevant consideration anymore if you capture digitally. As to (2), I would counter it by having far more flexibility in digital post production, and the matter of speed/productivity is really one that boils down to tool choice and proficiency. Trying a couple of different filters really takes no more than a few seconds in a typical RAW converter or photo editing tool - it takes less time than to reach for and open up the pocketbook of filters.1) I want to capture the correct image in-camera. In my film SLR days I would try on all of the filters that I thought might work, and bracket all the shots. That was relatively cheap to do because I bought Tri-X and Plus-X in bulk, and loaded my own cartridges. I had a very well-equipped darkroom, so I developed my own film, made contact sheets to select the optimum image, printed it with my Super Omega enlarger, and developed and dried it.
2) Because of my filter flip book and automatic bracketing I can get the correct image in-camera faster than trying to do color filtering in post.
... the matter of speed/productivity is really one that boils down to tool choice and proficiency.
I replaced it with a Pentax K-1000
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?