Here is a link to an updated Chemical page on Kodak Alaris' website: https://imaging.kodakalaris.com/photographers-photo-printing/resources/chem-tech-info
You will note that this shows a link to a list of Catalog updates, plus links respecting individual products that are labelled "New Formula, same great results!". If you click on those links, you will get the 2017 version of the applicable datasheet.
You will note that there are times for both old and new versions of the T-Max 3200 (TMZ) films - "KODAK T-MAX P3200 PROFESSIONAL ROLL FILMS" and "KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX P3200 FILM" on that data sheet.I am not sure that it really is the 2017 datasheet, because it has information on new TMY-3200 which was released in 2018, wasn't it?
I guess that I inherited that deep abiding concern about our environment from my Dad, who worked for almost all of his working life for Kodak. From what I can tell, my Dad's employer was extremely environmentally conscious. My Dad was environmentally active right into his 90s.Whenever somebody mentions "the environment", I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything. Ho hum.
Whenever somebody mentions "the environment", I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything. Ho hum.
Corrected
MSDS is and always was a basic list for medics or firemen. But we still have laws of patent and copyright. Consider Coke syrup. I wouldn't give it another thought.
oh for corn sakesWhenever someone brings politics uninvited into a discussion of developers I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything
HC-110's patent is long expired. I guess the only copyright is on the name, if even that. The current formula is protected by the idea of a trade secret, just like the Coke formula. But if you look at the MSDS sheets for the new and old one it is clear there are different chemicals, and different proportions of the active chemicals in them.
The only reason I brought up the MSDS sheet is because it reveals this fact. Coke doesn't have to file an MSDS because they do not make Coke out of hazardous chemicals (arguably...) If it was revealed that Coke had changed their formula and claimed it was a "new formula, but same great taste," I think it would be quite newsworthy.
There's a derivative of Phenidone, but also Catechol (also known as Pyrocatechol, mentioned as 1,2-Benzenediol in the MSDS)... Also, john_s, that isn't pyro, it's Phenidone or a derivative.
There's a derivative of Phenidone, but also Catechol (also known as Pyrocatechol, mentioned as 1,2-Benzenediol in the MSDS)
The new formula seems to be considerably less toxic to humans and the environment, so that's cool.
Yes, read it while half asleep & it turned into benzotriazole! Edited to remove nonsense.
Catechol has come and gone from HC110 over the years apparently - presumably it has some beneficial effect in certain formulations.
The most important post in this thread. The environment is the most critical thing to our species. More critical than developers. More critical than photography. More critical than anything. Without a clean, sustainable environment, our species will not survive.Whenever someone brings politics uninvited into a discussion of developers I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything...
Where did you access the MSDS from?Alright here's a weird one... The msds drastically changed since last night. The revision date now reads 8/15 -- tomorrow. Ian Grant's copy into his post is correct as of last night. The New New msds has all the toxic to aquatic life nasties back on the menu.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?