New HC-110 Formula

City Park Pond

H
City Park Pond

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
Icy Slough.jpg

H
Icy Slough.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Roses

A
Roses

  • 7
  • 0
  • 116
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 6
  • 4
  • 133
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 2
  • 0
  • 92

Forum statistics

Threads
197,495
Messages
2,759,947
Members
99,517
Latest member
RichardWest
Recent bookmarks
0

Grim Tuesday

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
738
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
On the page for the "2019 Edition" of HC-110 at B&H, if you zoom in on the bottle it says "NEW FORMULA." This is confirmed by Alaris' website, where next to t-max dev and HC-110 it says "New Formula, Same Great Results:" https://imaging.kodakalaris.com/photographers-photo-printing/resources/chem-tech-info

Based on the MSDS sheets, they seem to substantially differ:

Old HC-110: https://www.digitaltruth.com/products/kodak_msds/Kodak-HC110_Film_Developer-MSDS.pdf
New HC-110: http://sds.kodakalaris.com/temp/SDS US English - KODAK HC-110 Developer.pdf?t=637013511210472235

The new formula seems to be considerably less toxic to humans and the environment, so that's cool. But it really seems like a completely different developer. I hope it is not an end of an era. Time to stock up on the yellow syrup?
 
Last edited:

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,117
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
It looks fairly similar to me. Interested to see borax in the new version. The new version looks a bit simpler but in effect might be quite similar to the previous version. Developing agents (3 of them) are the same. I remember reading once that Kodak had done some smart chemical compounding to make the overall combination more soluble. Nice to see that it's a pyro developer (a bit, anyway).
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
OP
OP

Grim Tuesday

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
738
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Here is a link to an updated Chemical page on Kodak Alaris' website: https://imaging.kodakalaris.com/photographers-photo-printing/resources/chem-tech-info
You will note that this shows a link to a list of Catalog updates, plus links respecting individual products that are labelled "New Formula, same great results!". If you click on those links, you will get the 2017 version of the applicable datasheet.

I am not sure that it really is the 2017 datasheet, because it has information on new TMY-3200 which was released in 2018, wasn't it?
 

KN4SMF

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2019
Messages
334
Location
US
Format
Traditional
Whenever somebody mentions "the environment", I've got their number in an instant. It's part of the prism these people look through at everything. Ho hum. MSDS is and always was a basic list for medics or firemen. But we still have laws of patent and copyright. Consider Coke syrup. I wouldn't give it another thought.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I am not sure that it really is the 2017 datasheet, because it has information on new TMY-3200 which was released in 2018, wasn't it?
You will note that there are times for both old and new versions of the T-Max 3200 (TMZ) films - "KODAK T-MAX P3200 PROFESSIONAL ROLL FILMS" and "KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX P3200 FILM" on that data sheet.
I think that is an example of one of the revisions they did without updating the indicated revision date.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Whenever somebody mentions "the environment", I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything. Ho hum.
I guess that I inherited that deep abiding concern about our environment from my Dad, who worked for almost all of his working life for Kodak. From what I can tell, my Dad's employer was extremely environmentally conscious. My Dad was environmentally active right into his 90s.
 
OP
OP

Grim Tuesday

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
738
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Whenever somebody mentions "the environment", I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything. Ho hum.

Whenever someone brings politics uninvited into a discussion of developers I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything

Corrected

MSDS is and always was a basic list for medics or firemen. But we still have laws of patent and copyright. Consider Coke syrup. I wouldn't give it another thought.

HC-110's patent is long expired. I guess the only copyright is on the name, if even that. The current formula is protected by the idea of a trade secret, just like the Coke formula. But if you look at the MSDS sheets for the new and old one it is clear there are different chemicals, and different proportions of the active chemicals in them.

The only reason I brought up the MSDS sheet is because it reveals this fact. Coke doesn't have to file an MSDS because they do not make Coke out of hazardous chemicals (arguably...) If it was revealed that Coke had changed their formula and claimed it was a "new formula, but same great taste," I think it would be quite newsworthy.
 
Last edited:

KN4SMF

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2019
Messages
334
Location
US
Format
Traditional
Whenever someone brings politics uninvited into a discussion of developers I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything





HC-110's patent is long expired. I guess the only copyright is on the name, if even that. The current formula is protected by the idea of a trade secret, just like the Coke formula. But if you look at the MSDS sheets for the new and old one it is clear there are different chemicals, and different proportions of the active chemicals in them.

The only reason I brought up the MSDS sheet is because it reveals this fact. Coke doesn't have to file an MSDS because they do not make Coke out of hazardous chemicals (arguably...) If it was revealed that Coke had changed their formula and claimed it was a "new formula, but same great taste," I think it would be quite newsworthy.
oh for corn sakes
 

KN4SMF

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2019
Messages
334
Location
US
Format
Traditional
Matt King, if your 90 year old pop is still with us, tell him there's a fellow down here in NC who thanks him for his career in providing products he was able to use dependably to put a roof over his his head. My 88 year old dad was/is an insurance man who made sure the roof was restored if it burned down. I always found the Kodak products to be of a quality beyond question.
 

Disconnekt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Messages
480
Location
Inland Empire, CA
Format
Multi Format

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,827
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
There's probably several aspects in play here - the biggest one being the use of SO² and HBr gases in the manufacturing of HC-110 - there is likely a trade-off between being able to make this product safely and economically viably. Reformulation was probably seen to be the best way to keep it reasonably affordable in smaller batches. Remember that historically, HC-110's big markets were in industrial segments that used photographic materials but were not 'photography' - the graphic arts/ printing industry for one. The decline of the use of film materials there in favour of direct to plate output will have had a drastic impact on the demand for HC-110.
 
Last edited:

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,249
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
For easier comparison:

HC110 Old


Chemical name CAS No. Weight/Percentage

Diethanolamine 111-42-2 30 - 35

Sulphur dioxide 7446-09-5 15 - 20

Hydroquinone 123-31-9 5 -10

Diethylene glycol 111-46-6 5 -10

Ethanolamine 141-43-5 5 -10

Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid 67-43-6 1 -5

Potassium bromide 7758-02-3 1 -< 5

1,2-Benzenediol 120-80-9 0.1 -< 1

Ethylene glycol 107-21-1 0.1 -< 1

3-Pyrazolidinone, 4-methyl-1-phenyl- 2654-57-1 0.1 -< 1



HC-110 New

Chemical name CAS No Weight/Percentage

Hydroquinone 123-31-9 10 - < 20

Potassium sulphite 10117-38-1 10 - < 5

Diethylene glycol 20111-46-6 5 - < 10

Sodium tetraborate, pentahydrate 12179-04-3 1 - < 3

4-hydroxymethyl-4-methyl-1-phenyl-3-pyrazolidinone 13047-13-7 0.1 - 1

Diethanolamine 111-42-2 0.1 – 1

Potassium hydroxide 1310-58-3 0.1 – 1

1.2-Benzenediol 120-80-9 0.1 – 1
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,827
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
There's a derivative of Phenidone, but also Catechol (also known as Pyrocatechol, mentioned as 1,2-Benzenediol in the MSDS)

Yes, read it while half asleep & it turned into benzotriazole! Edited to remove nonsense.

Catechol has come and gone from HC110 over the years apparently - presumably it has some beneficial effect in certain formulations.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,990
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The new formula seems to be considerably less toxic to humans and the environment, so that's cool.

By exchanging DEA for Hydroquinone so to say?

I thought I knew something about eco- and human-toxicity. Maybe someone more knowledgable makes me wiser.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,249
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Yes, read it while half asleep & it turned into benzotriazole! Edited to remove nonsense.

Catechol has come and gone from HC110 over the years apparently - presumably it has some beneficial effect in certain formulations.


Pyrogallol was used in two pre-WWII commercial D&P developers as an Oxygen scavenging agent, it's possible the Pyrocatechin (Catechol) plays a similar role here in HC-110. If my memory is correct there's also a Phenidone, Hydroquinone, and Pyrogallol developer in one of Ilford's Patents.

Ian
 

Tim Stapp

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
556
Location
Big Rapids, MI
Format
4x5 Format
Any thoughts on the new formula's keeping properties? One of the features that I have always liked about HC 110 has been it's keeping property.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,525
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
Whenever someone brings politics uninvited into a discussion of developers I've got their number in an instant. It's the prism these people look through at everything...
The most important post in this thread. The environment is the most critical thing to our species. More critical than developers. More critical than photography. More critical than anything. Without a clean, sustainable environment, our species will not survive.
 

markbau

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
867
Location
Australia
Format
Analog
The solution to pollution is dilution!
 
OP
OP

Grim Tuesday

Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
738
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Alright here's a weird one... The msds drastically changed since last night. The revision date now reads 8/15 -- tomorrow. Ian Grant's copy into his post is correct as of last night. The New New msds has all the toxic to aquatic life nasties back on the menu.
 

KN4SMF

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2019
Messages
334
Location
US
Format
Traditional
I haven't researched my contention concerning the MSDS. Only my opinion as to the original purpose of it, which was to aid emergency personnel with a quick reference on treating poisonings or fires. If companies were forced to list ingredients like a cake recipe then they were wide-open to others stealing intellectual property and their customers. This is all I meant here. Thanks.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,950
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Alright here's a weird one... The msds drastically changed since last night. The revision date now reads 8/15 -- tomorrow. Ian Grant's copy into his post is correct as of last night. The New New msds has all the toxic to aquatic life nasties back on the menu.
Where did you access the MSDS from?
I ask because a lot of Kodak and Kodak Alaris data links are problematic if one is linking to them on an international site. They tend to force you into a re-direct if you are outside the US. So sometimes, a link that works on a Tuesday will end up in a different result on a Wednesday, because the internal system comes to a conclusion that (in my case) I must want to see the Canadian market link, not the US one.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom