mexipike
Allowing Ads
Anyone try either of these papers yet?? I got mine but will not have the chance to try them until after the holidays.
and I know it sounds daft but they really do look sharper ( and they are )
Yes, it is 'sharper' by design. Its a new type of emulsion.
The addition of Moersch Finisher Blue made it colder though exposure times were then increased. (Expect it is Benzotriazole.)
Here is a link to Tim Rudman's newsletter and review of these two papers:
http://www.timrudman.com/newsletters/view/end-of-year-newsletter-2013
In which he reports:
"MG Cooltone...The air dried glossy surface is significantly more shiny than that of Classic , IV or WT."
Disappointing...
Since you've now used both Cooltone FB and Warmtone FB, would you please tell us how the smoothness and gloss of their surfaces compare? Thanks in advance.Second printing session trying out the new Coldtone...A lot different process then how I work with warmtone...
Since you've now used both Cooltone FB and Warmtone FB, would you please tell us how the smoothness and gloss of their surfaces compare? Thanks in advance.
Have fun you guys and good luck! .... I think this is going to be a very special paper.
Sal, I was mulling over (while printing my last sheet) that the closest I can compare it to would be the Slavich Unibrom 160 without the finish. I mourn the loss of not be able to get that anymore here in the states and bought 7 boxes to stock. I will pull out a couple sheets of my stash and run the same shot through and see how they compare side by side. And I LOVE that paper!
I did a few runs with filters and without and I have to say I prefer the look straight. But of course, that's a personal preference.
Shipment of MG Classic has arrived!
Hopefully I have enough chems for a testing all-nighter
My goodness! And the characteristic curves for MGIV classic show no mid-tone compression even at grade 00.
I will be ordering this pronto and testing over the holidays. Happy holidays to me!!!!!
Thanks again Varya. That's the perfect frame of reference, since Galerie is my primary paper and I agree 100% with your assessment of how exquisite its surface is. On a slight tangent, if you'd like the most perfectly neutral print achievable, develop Galerie for 3 minutes in Moersch SE6 1+15 at 68 degrees (or equivalent time at a different temperature), then tone it in KRST 1+20 for 4 minutes at 75 degrees F....What I can say is that I use Galerie quit often and the CT is much glossier and in all actuality would prefer this in matte, but it won't stop me from using it. It's not glossy compared to an RC paper, though. The substrate of the CT is very nice but again the Galerie surface is exquisite...
Thanks for that extra effort. Unfortunately, I have no experience with the Slavich paper, but your first comparison with Galerie was exactly what was needed. I'm not sure I'll even try the Cooltone FB since its surface is so shiny. I might give Classic FB a go in Moersch SE6, since it's reported to have the same surface gloss as MGIV FB. However, Rudman says it's warmer than MGIV FB, so even SE6 + selenium might not neutralize it sufficiently without going purple. We shall see....I was mulling over (while printing my last sheet) that the closest I can compare it to would be the Slavich Unibrom 160 without the finish...
You can get Unibrom from here: http://www.laserreflections.com/Unibrom.html
She orders it a few times a year and you just have to let her know ahead of time and be patient. Really good customer service.
Thanks Michael. I've a busy period coming up, so might not get to trying these new papers for a while, but hold off sending swatches. You've already incurred enough international postage expense.Sal, the sheen of MG Classic looks (to me) like MGIV. So far I've developed it in Dektol and Moersch SE3 for comparison with MGIV. Haven't had a chance to compare with Galerie yet. After I do selenium at various dilutions I can send you the SE3 swatches if you are interested.
Thanks Varya. I'll probably end up trying both FB Classic and FB Cooltone, but it might be a while. Given that Rudman wrote the Cooltone is "much shinier" and you observe "slightly shinier," the only way to know whether I'll be happy with the finish is by printing on it myself.I just held the Coldtone up against the Galerie and it is only SLIGHTLY shinier. Don't let that sway your decision. Nothing compares to Galerie, however...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?