No sorry, I have no photos online. Well, honestly, I don't think we can really evaluate the characteristics of a film by looking at the pictures online, on computer monitors. It doesn't make much sense.
To see what the (a) film can deliver you have to look at real prints, or in this case also at the BW positives / slides on a lightbox and in projection.
Best regards,
Henning
P.S. I have some pictures of the Wehner reversal process online (and Scala), but both are with different films, not the Silvermax.
I don't think we can really evaluate the characteristics of a film by looking at the pictures online, on computer monitors. It doesn't make much sense.
You also got the Wehner pictures online. It is not good for evaluating, but good enough to get a first impression.
Would you give me the link to the Wehner pictures? I am very interested.
O.k., o.k., you have all won.....
Henning, I'm sorry to say, but as Maco itself says that the films are identical
But maybe it is a different batch, a batch which Harman didn't want to use, or something like that, I don't know. But it is completely clear that Harman did not make a special new film just for Mr Schroeder. We all see how difficult it is to make a new film.......
and it would be really strange if Harman created a new unique film just to sell a small batch under the label of Rollei and stop production then.
This would be completely nonsense and I'm sure that Harman does not make such nonsense.
Its a wild guess with those scans, look at the sky area of the 100% crops...
I am not familiar with this V700 (Epson?) scanner but it looks like 3200ppi is way beyond its optical capabilities and the grain is extremely interpolated..
Finally someone posted some images from that film on rangefinderforum.com
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=123486&page=2
The pictures look very clean and nice but not very APX like. Still a nice addition to the filmworld.
Congrats to Fotoimpex
Dominik
This might be but the tonality is nothing like APX. Still I think think the examples look good just not like APX.
Dominik
Do one have to be a member to see them? I scrolled both pages on that thread, and still found no images...
:confused:
Looks like the post with scans was deleted but You can still see it in the google cache.. probably not for long
https://webcache.googleusercontent....um.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1977372%2
Probably your computer has the images cached, I only get broken image placeholders from that cache link, thanks anyway! (Maybe you can dig them up from your cache?).
I wish folks used clean water, filtered fixer, clean tank/spiral etc.. while doing those..
Thank you very much, Henning. I like the "test-shots" you made. I think everybody here knows that the monitors can not show how the projection or even the print look in real life.
I guess seeing the projection for the first time is quite stunning.
Kind regards
Tim
So how are people liking this new film? How does it compare to other high silver films like Efke? How does it look when used in regular developers like Xtol? Freestyle should be getting more in hopefully tomorrow, so I've ordered a roll to try it. I do prefer old school grain films though, which is why I like Tri-X and all Efke films.
Whoa! $6.49 a roll when Tmax 100 and Acros are $4.50 from B&H?? And Fomapan100 for $3.69? Even FP-4 is only $5.75. That Silvermax better be something special....
Strange pricing!
Silvermax is the cheapest alternative when ordering from fotoimpex.de, even cheaper than Fomapan 100, while Acros is the most expensive.
Trond
Not strange at all. We have been here before. It is yet another example of "what the market will bear" or what the seller(s) think the market will bear. Clearly the sellers believe there is a premium on something new with lots of silver in the U.S. market.
Cynical on my part? Of course but I am only reciprocating the cynicism shown to me by the sellers.
pentaxuser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?