Welcome to Apug!
Well, insread of searchung at Agfa data sheets, looking at Kodak data sheets makes more sense to me.
Though it seems Kodak never had that the HC110 processing times online...
thank you@arturo_rs You can check if massivedevchart lists times for Kentmere Pan films or Rollei RPX, which are considered to be the same as NEW Agfaphoto APX 100/400
I am puzzled !
The data of the AgfaPhoto APX in HC 110 are on the massivedevchart.
But those of the Agfa APX are not. That is why I assumed the OP actually meant what he wrote, namely inquiring on the 17 years old Agfa made APX films.
There is pretty wide consensus that these films are the same as Kentmere 100 and 400. Maybe you can find more info under that name.
I don't use HC110, but for other developers (xtol, FX-39, Rodinal, D-76) I use Kentmere 100 and 400 times for AgfaPhoto APX films with good results.There is pretty wide consensus that these films are the same as Kentmere 100 and 400. Maybe you can find more info under that name.
What about Rollei RPX 100 and 400. Might be the same too? What do you think?
I recently shot a roll of Agfaphoto APX 100 in bright cloudless daylight and tried different things, including HC-110 (b) for 6min, 7min, and dilution (g) 1:119 60min semi stand dev.
With this first test I found 7min to be a little too much in theses particular conditions, but that should be OK with a nicer light. Of course, the density I like to get might not be what you like.
Incident reading from a sekonic light meter, standard agitation (30s first min, 10s at the start of every minutes).
Good luck !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?