"New" 220 film from Reflx

Disconnekt

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2017
Messages
481
Location
Inland Empire, CA
Format
Multi Format
Just saw on Nicos Photo Show that Reflx has new 220 color film (Kodak Aerocolor 2460) for sale.
So for anybody that wants fresh 220 film, here ya go. Yeah its $25 a roll, but at least its something.

https://reflxlab.com/products/reflx-lab-pro-100-color-negative-film-220


Cool that a small company like Reflx can release fresh 220 film without having to add it last second to a kickstarter.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,268
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
Yes, glad to see it!
I like that film a lot...but
Aerocolor has a serious light-piping issue, so it needs to be loaded into a processing machine/tank&reel/whatever in total darkness.
 

halfaman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,339
Location
Bilbao
Format
Multi Format
I understood that ligh-piping was caused by the thinner base of Aerocolor when spooled in standard 35 mm cartridges. Light seal felts are not good enough with this film preventing light getting in.

In 120/220 should be not a problem.
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,841
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
halfaman said:
In 120/220 should be not a problem.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't there be light piping along the edges, though? With 35mm you lose only part of the leader and maybe the first frame. In 120/220, both edges along the entire length of the film are exposed during camera loading/unloading.
 

halfaman

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,339
Location
Bilbao
Format
Multi Format
koraks said:
Wouldn't there be light piping along the edges, though? With 35mm you lose only part of the leader and maybe the first frame. In 120/220, both edges along the entire length of the film are exposed during camera loading/unloading.
Click to expand...

Aercolor base thickness is not so different than 120/220 film. It is 100 microns, photo 35 mm film is 125-130 microns and 120/220 film 100-110 microns. Kodak is changing all films to a PET base, so there should be no big difference from current 120 photo film compared to Aerocolor when properly spooled.
 
Last edited:
  • Roger Cole
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Misread what I replied to

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,268
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
koraks said:
Isn't that true for all film, though?

My concern would be with light piping along the edges of the film during loading and unloading in the camera...
Click to expand...

Some labs use roller-transport machines that require separating the film from the backing paper, and putting the film in a 'cassette' before attaching a leader card.
This requires an inch or so of raw film to be exposed to light.
That's when the light-piping happens.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,087
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format

Fortunately, the "lab" in the back of my house doesn't have that problem.
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,402
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
mshchem said:
I would doubt this.
Click to expand...

In the Smarter Every Day video series IIRC they were coating Kodak Ektar and if continuity is held, they were showing ESTAR as the base material. I actually have been curious about it but haven't gotten to ask Kodak if they are migrating all products to ESTAR. If it is happening, it is on a rolling basis as a continuous improvement.
They held stocks of Acetate rolls and purchased from Germany, but in house they show how they have capabilities to make Polyester.

IMO for 120 and sheet films, Polyester seems to have just advantages. Drew Wiley brings this up through dimensional stability for registration purposes.

Anything 220 is good news. Another question that I should send to Kodak is if they have mothballed the 220 finishing line. Aside of that, what is known that the backing paper is a pain point.

Haven't ever tried either cine or aeral respools yet, I am to loyal to the still films... Might buy a roll to try, I am actually interested in the hotshoe meter that Reflx sells.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,260
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
EK extrudes PET base for in-house use and I suspect other markets/customers. I would be surprised to see PET in 35mm film cinema camera films etc. I was surprised to see Kodak Gold 120 with an Estar base.
 

Brad Deputy

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
171
Location
Martha Lake, WA
Format
35mm
It started with Portra 800 and Color plus, then ultramax and now I hear gold 200, all on polyester.

Eagerly waiting to see if/when their professional films migrate to PET.

Cinema negative film will likely remain acetate due to risk of high speed film transport damage risk to cine cameras.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,966
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

The Smarter Every Day video series was mostly filmed during the days when the machines are being either going through maintenance or are being used for purposes like training or specialized purposes like "filming demonstration video". As a result, some of what you see in the videos is being used because it can be shown in room light. Otherwise impractical for use in production short ends of a variety of materials are often used for that purpose.
mshchem said:
EK extrudes PET base for in-house use and I suspect other markets/customers. I would be surprised to see PET in 35mm film cinema camera films etc. I was surprised to see Kodak Gold 120 with an Estar base.
Click to expand...

EK's PET base extrusion offerings for non-photographic uses by third parties is a growing part of EK's manufacturing business.
There is a worldwide shortage of the acetate used for photographic film, which EK sources mostly from the EU. So there are advantages for EK to consider switching to Estar (PET) base. But there are also serious disadvantages, because switching is not simple and is quite expensive to implement, not least because it disrupts production. As a result, you may or may not see EK switching, and if you do, it will likely be a slow and gradual switch, and it may not happen with all products.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,495
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm

The lab could do the film to leader card splicing in subdued lighting and avoid the light piping. Any decent lab should do this.
(When I had my minilab, I did it with 35mm film on PET base and had no light piping)
 

richyd

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
193
Location
London UK
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for highlighting this. The 220 was gone but I ordered some rolls of 120 and of 250D too, prices were reasonable. Order delivered today and I must say I'm very impressed with the packaging looking professional, boxed and foil sealed fully labelled and with quick delivery. Looking forward to using it if we get a sunny winters day.
 

hoomuzzz

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2024
Messages
32
Location
China Mainland
Format
Multi Format
Heard about this in China also. The name is "Areonega" by Alien Film, available in both 120 and 220 format.
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
koraks said:
Isn't that true for all film, though?

My concern would be with light piping along the edges of the film during loading and unloading in the camera...
Click to expand...

Certainly not true of all film. I've loaded film into cameras standing in absolute blazing mid day sun with no issues. (35mm anyway. I don't know that I'm right but I've always felt more leery of such with 120 and at least load in shade. But with just finding a shady area I've had no problems.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…