New 110 Camera

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,935
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The 127 Ektachrome super slides I shot on my first camera, a Brownie Starmite, projected really well.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm

You are right, I wrote 127 and I meant 110. I was surprises those new 110 rolls were pre-flashed with frame boundaries. I actually would be surprised just the same for any format.
 

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
You are right, I wrote 127 and I meant 110. I was surprises those new 110 rolls were pre-flashed with frame boundaries. I actually would be surprised just the same for any format.

All 110 film, even the old rolls, were pre-flashed. I believe it has to do with the cheap meniscus lenses in most 110 cameras. Since the lenses were low-quality, you had a distinct loss of sharpness in the corners; so much that people in tests complained. Instead of using better quality lenses, Kodak put frame boundaries in in order to prevent photofinishers from using the softer edges of the image.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
All 110 film, even the old rolls, were pre-flashed.

But how could it be possible then that some camera generated 13 x 17 mm and some others 13 x 19 mm? (I must have read this somewhere).

Also that means that Lomography created a 110 square frame cartridge which is not compatible, if I get it right, with all the 110 cameras already existing.

If they had produced a "non pre-flashed" 100 cartridge the same cartridge would work on all cameras.

Thinking about it, this has to do with the "registration pin".

If a 13 x 17 mm camera mounts a 13 x 13 110 cartridge, and it uses the "registration pin" for film advance, the result is going to be a disaster in any case because a 13 x 13 110 cartridge will have its registration pins at a distance slightly above 13mm while a 13 x 17 110 cartridge will have them at a distance slightly superior to 17 mm.

13 x 19 cameras were probably designed to ignore the registration pins, I guess.
 
OP
OP

bsdunek

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
1,611
Location
Michigan
Format
Multi Format

So, what you need is one of these => http://www.amazon.com/Holga-60mm-Le...47132209&sr=8-2&keywords=holga+lens+for+nikon

They are also available for Canon and in other focal lengths.
 

nickrapak

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
But how could it be possible then that some camera generated 13 x 17 mm and some others 13 x 19 mm? (I must have read this somewhere).

Most (if not all) 110 cameras generated 13x19mm images. This is then masked to 13x17.
 
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
325
Location
Ringerike, Norway
Format
35mm

You're assuming that a cartridge preflashed for 13x13 (if such a thing exists) would have different perforations than a cartridge preflashed for 13x17. As the example photos clearly show, this Diana 110 camera simply puts a 13x13 image in the 13x17 image area. Lomo doesn't make a special kind of 110 film just for this one camera.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
I see.
So it's the worst of both worlds: image surface is smaller, but number of images per roll is the same.
This must fit well in some way with the Lomography style
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…