that used to be the standard method. Shoot in 35mm, then present on TV. Now It could be any combination from all digital, to transfer from the cut negative. (kodak actually made a print film with lower contrast at one time so that one could make a full print and then scan for TV - in 1983 - EASTMAN Color LC Print film, 7/5380. Low contrast (minus 15%) for video transfers. )Are these (tv) ever in film then converted?
Are these (tv) ever in film then converted?
Currently micro-dosing episodes so it doesn't end as fast
I am sure that @Kino being in the business may have more Knowledge.
yes, I have not been on that site for a long time. Dabid Mullen ASC is always a great fountain of information.if David Mullen was the DP, it could have been shot either on film or digital.
He hangs out on Cinematography.com, so there's probably some good info on that site...
I agree they could have "dirtied-it-up" a bit. Kudos to the cinematography team on this one for sure.No idea about how it was shot, but it's gorgeous to the eye. I'd just like a touch of grittiness...I still paused to enjoy certain takes a little longer. I like the slow pace of the story too...off to watch the second episode!
I’ve an empty Kodak can from the show: black plastic bag inside and Kodak lot no label inside.Most of The Walking Dead (to cite a relatively recent tv show) was shot on 16mm film.
Just started the last episode (probably finishing tonight).
I found it interesting/strange the press photographers with their press cameras just drop the flash bulbs on the street after use...
But yes, beautifully shot black and white!
I read all the books and watched the main Matt Damon rendering. I loved this series. There were some major departures or at least developments. The struggle with the murder boat was allegorical--the likes of Moby-Dick or The Old Man and the Sea. The other major struggle Ripley has--I won't mention it because it's a spoiler--is a terrific study of the impediments to spontaneous action.
Wonderful acting, wonderful writing, wonderful cinematography. The ending leaves open the possibility of subsequent years, and I really hope they do that.
I admit that when I read topics where people discuss 'beautiful grain' of this and that film and/or developer I don't know what they are talking about, but I did find Ripley a bit too plasticky at times. Does it need a bit of grain?
Beautifully* shot, otherwise. More so, considering that it's a tv show production.
* except that one selective colour shot that was totally unnecessary and serves no purpose at all
Can't remember the color shot. Please remind me.
Can't remember the color shot. Please remind me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?