Hi,
I am interested to give neopan 400 a try in zonesystem.
In which developer, I am not sure yet.
I have pyrocat-HD, Rodinal, XTOL and DiXactol Ultra. So far I have thought to use either Pyrocat-HD or XTOL. Later diluted to 1:2 or 1:3.
XTOL has it's benefits on sensitometry which means easier calibration process to me. But how is Pyrocat-HD with Neopan 400?
I can calibrate Neopan with XTOL using 5 rolls - so it's really easy. But I like staining developers - especially DiXactol. However I think that it might result too grainy negatives for my taste. Thus Pyrocat-HD.
With Pyrocat-HD I have to calibrate using empirical printing calibration. So is there any good starting points for developing time (I use 24°C temperature).
Also, how big time changes does Pyrocat-HD requires for expansion and compact?
Thanks,
Jukka Vuokko
I am interested to give neopan 400 a try in zonesystem.
In which developer, I am not sure yet.
I have pyrocat-HD, Rodinal, XTOL and DiXactol Ultra. So far I have thought to use either Pyrocat-HD or XTOL. Later diluted to 1:2 or 1:3.
XTOL has it's benefits on sensitometry which means easier calibration process to me. But how is Pyrocat-HD with Neopan 400?
I can calibrate Neopan with XTOL using 5 rolls - so it's really easy. But I like staining developers - especially DiXactol. However I think that it might result too grainy negatives for my taste. Thus Pyrocat-HD.
With Pyrocat-HD I have to calibrate using empirical printing calibration. So is there any good starting points for developing time (I use 24°C temperature).
Also, how big time changes does Pyrocat-HD requires for expansion and compact?
Thanks,
Jukka Vuokko

