Negative puzzle

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 2
  • 2
  • 15
Couples

A
Couples

  • 1
  • 0
  • 58
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 3
  • 1
  • 89
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 109

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,040
Messages
2,785,236
Members
99,790
Latest member
suanmein
Recent bookmarks
0

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
Hello All,

Monday was the perfect day to go to Beechwood cemetery, here in Ottawa, to shoot some IR film.
Tuesday was the perfect (cloudy) day to develop said film.

Or was it.

At first the negatives looked fine, however once scanned as a digital contact sheet the problem became very apparent.
As can be seen in the attached scans (over sharpened for emphasis) there are hundreds of tiny black spots on the negatives. They appear throughout the roll including the line near the top off the picture. I have developed dozens of rolls of Rollei IR 400 film in DS-1 during the past 3 years with no problems. I have developed thousands of rolls since the late 1960s and have never seen this, ever. The next day I shot a roll of FP4+ in the same camera and developed it using the same technique, tank and chemicals with no sign of any defect.

The camera used was a Fujica GS645W, film Rollei IR 400 developed in home brew DS-1, stop bath and Hypam fixer.

I plan on shooting another roll of IR film the next sunny day in hopes of a better result. In the meantime can anyone offer some insight re what went wrong?

Mike

dusty1.jpg
dusty2.jpg
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,988
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I'll say this, Mike. Whatever you have done the top pic it has given it an almost a 3D quality in terms of the way the church stands out. It looks great.

Sorry, no idea about the spots, though.

pentaxuser
 
OP
OP
BainDarret

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
I'll say this, Mike. Whatever you have done the top pic it has given it an almost a 3D quality in terms of the way the church stands out. It looks great.

Sorry, no idea about the spots, though.

pentaxuser

Thanks Pentaxuser, I think the shadows from the back/side lighting give it the 3D look.
Imagine my disappointment when I saw the defects. No way I'll ever be able to retouch out all those spots!
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,470
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Do you have stuff floating in your fixer? How fresh (or unfresh) is it?

Aside from spots, the light on the chapel with the clouds is spectacular, and the spots give it an interesting surreal effect. Not what you were looking for, obviously, but cool in a way.
 
OP
OP
BainDarret

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
Do you have stuff floating in your fixer? How fresh (or unfresh) is it?

Aside from spots, the light on the chapel with the clouds is spectacular, and the spots give it an interesting surreal effect. Not what you were looking for, obviously, but cool in a way.

I used fresh fixer and used the same developer and fixer when I processed the roll of FP4+ that came out ok.
I think I will print the negative just to see if I like it.
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,809
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
Notice that the line of more concentrated spotting continues across to the next photo as if having to do with some transport mechanism.
 

osella

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
115
Location
Vermont
Format
8x10 Format
It’s possible that it is a humidity/backing paper issue.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,051
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I shoot this film regularly, in 120 and 4x5. I've never seen this before. I'm pretty sure it's not backing paper offset. At least I don't think it is. Let us know how the next roll turns out when you've shot and developed it!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
It does not look like that paper/emulsion interaction. And yes, that "stripe" parallel to the edges caught my attention too.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
From past reports, it’s expired film, poorly stored, multiple thaw/freeze cycles.
 

Todd Niccole

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
59
Format
35mm
I used to get something like this, streaks of dots from what turned out to be reusing the same wetting agent many times. So, I now make it fresh to order and never reuse it.
 
OP
OP
BainDarret

BainDarret

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Ottawa, On
Format
Multi Format
Next time I process film I will filter all solutions.
I don't think it is the wetting agent as I mix it fresh with distilled water every time and use it one shot.
The film is not subjected to freezing and thawing and is always given time to acclimatize.
There is no evidence of physical damage from transport in camera that would cause the line.
I will update in a few days when I process the next roll of 400 IR.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom