I use the same Print File sleeves as @Dirb9. I cut three frames in the top two rows, and two frames each for the bottom rows.I use the print-file 120-4UB ( https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/prod...le_PF1204UB100_Archival_Storage_Page_for.html ), and do 2 strips of 2 negatives, and 2 strips of 3, as I don't like fussing around with single frames if I can avoid it. Bonus for 220, as 3HB or 4UB will fit a 220 roll in two pages instead of 3. The pages are slightly oversize (8.5x11) compared to the standard 8x10" 120 pages, but the 35mm pages I use (35-6HB) are slightly oversize as well, so they all fit the same binder.
Be sure to note that you will also need the larger binders, and if you are like me need to put those binders on a different shelf than where the rest of my negative binders reside.Great, thanks for the info everyone. I'll get some of the 120 4UB pages and get on with it!
Neither will Nikon and Epson holders...If you use a Minolta MF film scanner keep in mind that the film tray will not accept film strip of 3 6x7 frames. There is only room for 2 6x7 frames.
Actually the reason why I stuck two 6 x 6 and 6 x 9; never saw the benefit of 6x7So how do people deal with storing 6x7 negatives? I am used to shooting either 6x6 or 6x9. The Photofile 120-4B page handles this. Either 3 6x6 shots per row, times 4. Or 2 6x9 shots per row, times 4
But 6x7 gets me 2 6x7 per row with 2 shots left over. So I tuck them into the bottom row overlapping the other negatives. Dangerous scratch move.
Do I need to get a different Photofile page design? 3 rows, at 3 per row, still leaves a straggler negative.
Thanks.
I put the extra on the next Printfile... Glassine! Plastic is an abomination!
Same issue with the Epson V850. Three negatives don't fit.If you use a Minolta MF film scanner keep in mind that the film tray will not accept film strip of 3 6x7 frames. There is only room for 2 6x7 frames.
6x7 format fits 8x10" and 16x20" prints nicely. What camera do you use for 6x9 format shots?Actually the reason why I stuck two 6 x 6 and 6 x 9; never saw the benefit of 6x7
I modified my Minolta medium format try to fit 3 6x7 frame strips. To scan the middle 6x7 frame the leading frame will bump into a barrier to keep the film to reach beyond the barrier. I cut the barrier off. It's only plastic. I opened up a 6 cm wide opening out of the barrier. The film will only be about 1 cm sticking beyond the barrier and it scans just fine. So I use PrintFile 120-4UB pages too. One page will be enough for a 120 roll, two pages for one 220 roll.Neither will Nikon and Epson holders...But I still use the 120-4UB pages.
some time ago a Fuji. now ,a roll-film back on my 4x5s.6x7 format fits 8x10" and 16x20" prints nicely. What camera do you use for 6x9 format shots?
You might try 6cm roll sleeves, which can handle the over length of 6cm x ? framed negative s.
I have almost a full roll of this archive material and can cut 6x9cm just as easily as any 6x4.5, 6x6, etc films.
Plus, if you've a mind to, you can store the rolls in a single sleeve.
Cheers and Godspeed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?