Negative film for landscapes / still lifes etc.

digiconvert

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
817
Location
Cannock UK
Format
Multi Format
I use Kodak negative film, Portra 160 mainly, but even the VC version is bland for anything other than portraits (for which it is superb). I've tried the Elite 400 and it's Ok but I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations for a contrasty neg film . In slides I like Kodachrome if that's any guide - yes I do know I'm an awkward cus
 
OP
OP

digiconvert

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
817
Location
Cannock UK
Format
Multi Format
Which paper are you printing on?

I'm new to printing and basicaly 'competent' no more. I print on Endura (I know it's not great either but I like 5 x 7). But even commercial prints on Fuji look washed out with Portra
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
What's wrong with Endura? Ba hum bug -) Endura Supra? Endura Ultra? Or Endura Portra ? Seems Kodak really likes reusing names.
 

papo

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2006
Messages
33
Location
Czech Republ
Format
35mm
Isn't there a problem with exposure? Do the negatives have sufficient density? With color negatives it's always safer to overexpose than to underexpose, even slightly. Try to make a series starting with normal (measured) exposure and going up to, say, EV+2 (lens open two more stops) and compare the resulting prints.
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Along the lines of papo's answer.... try rating your portras at 120 or even 100. I do this with fuji pro s and am generally very pleased with it. The results can be quite 'velviesque'.
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
Kodak Portra 160NC does look a little blah for landscapes, but it is often very good for still lifes. It has about the most accurate color I've seen, but accuracy may not be what's wanted most in the prints. I've found that the UltraColor films (100UC and 400UC) do quite well for landscapes, although the most recent versions may be a bit too much. The new Portra 400VC is more saturated than the older version, and it may be about what you need. If you are using 35mm, you may want to investigate the Kodak Gold films (amateur line available in camera stores and supermarkets). They are excellent films with high saturation and a bit more contrast than the Portra line. Although the UC and VC films have high color saturation, they are low contrast films. If you are printing on traditional papers, this may a problem. I think the look of Endura Supra is fine, but you might want the higher contrast of Endura Ultra.
 
OP
OP

digiconvert

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
817
Location
Cannock UK
Format
Multi Format
... If you are using 35mm, you may want to investigate the Kodak Gold films (amateur line available in camera stores and supermarkets). They are excellent films with high saturation and a bit more contrast than the Portra line..

A coleague at work has just given me 20 rolls of Kodak Gold 200 - FOR FREE !
so I may give it a try

Thanks to all for the advice.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I use UC 400, it is especially good for red rock in Utah and Arizona; fall colors and flowers everywhere. When I heard that they were discontinuing 120 UC 400, I went out a brought 55 rolls of 120 and 75 rolls of 135 to keep it from the hoarders!

Steve
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,168
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
kodak 100uc

I don't shoot much color but I recently did some photos with this film and I like it. Seems hard to get BAD pix with it...give it a try!!
Best, Peter
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…