Doing test strips is an art in itself.
Start by acknowledging that the negative is a bit low in contrast, and try again at grade 3.
When you do your test progression, do some exposures that go farther - you need to be sure that you are attaining full black.
When you evaluate the tests for exposure, you need to key on an upper mid-tone or low highlight - something like the circled area here:
View attachment 252733
Once you arrive at a base exposure that gives you satisfactory upper midtones, adjust the contrast to give you satisfactory shadows. If you based your exposure determination on an upper midtone, using the speed matching capability in most variable contrast systems should allow you to change contrast with little or no change in exposure.
When you have a result that is satisfactory as to overall contrast and exposure, use judicious amounts of dodging and burning adjustments to enhance the results - I would guess that a bit of dodging of the tomato highlights might add some sparkle.
It does look like the results one gets from old paper, bad developer or safelight fog.
Have you done a safelight test. Here is the fully detailed version I use: https://www.kodak.com/uploadedfiles..._motion_products_filter_K4_Safelight_1106.pdf
Matt's advice is good but your response does not seem to accept that the choice of exposure time is a separate process as to the choice of grade. If your shortest time on the test strip is too muddy, you must go up in grade barring Matt last post.
Yes knowing what to change can be a process.No, I do get that those are two different factors. Knowing when to change one vs. the other is one of the things I want to learn. My plan is to take both of your suggestions and try again at 3 as well as 5.
Yes knowing what to change can be a process.
If you want more white you decrease time or increase grade
If you want more black then you decrease time or increase grade
Changing time will not change the dynamic range ( if we can use that word)
Changing grade will alter the dynamic range on either side of the midtone; which is the point of what Matt was referring to in post 50
I think Bill meant to say "If you want more black then you increase time or increase grade".If you want more black then you decrease time or increase grade
I think Bill meant to say "If you want more black then you increase time or increase grade".
I find it easier to adjust exposure to achieve the high midtone/low highlight tone I want. That works better for me than keying on a middle tone.
I then adjust the grade to change the appearance of the mid-tione details and change the black.
Each to their own.
A good recipe for tackling most things in life successfully, now I come to think of itTurns out that playing it straight, using fresh, quality materials, reading and following the instructions, and just generally not shooting one's self in the foot, works really well!
Well done!Just wanted to dig this thread up one more time, to say thanks to everyone who contributed here and elsewhere: after a few weeks of reading, asking questions, and taking my time, last night I did my first real session in my new little home darkroom. I took a roll of fresh Delta 100 I had exposed (mostly) intelligently and carefully made the best contact sheet I could, and was able to almost effortlessly run off straight prints from half a dozen negatives, all grade 2, using the contact sheet to judge the minor adjustments needed between them, and in general had by far my most productive and least frustrating printing session ever. Turns out that playing it straight, using fresh, quality materials, reading and following the instructions, and just generally not shooting one's self in the foot, works really well!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?