ND Filters and Hasselblad V System

Mansion

A
Mansion

  • 2
  • 2
  • 56
Lake

A
Lake

  • 5
  • 1
  • 60
One cloud, four windmills

D
One cloud, four windmills

  • 2
  • 0
  • 37
Priorities #2

D
Priorities #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28
Priorities

D
Priorities

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,019
Messages
2,784,740
Members
99,776
Latest member
Alames
Recent bookmarks
0

SteveT

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2016
Messages
16
Location
South East England
Format
35mm
Having recently acquired a 501cm Hasselblad I have been trying out various lenses to see which one I will find most useful when it comes to landscape photography. Having looked at my recent prints (Provia 100) I have been a little disappointed with the results and was wondering whether or not I should invest in a ND Filter to cut down the light coming into the camera. If so which Filter would you recommend and why?

When I handed in my film to be processed I was asked if I wanted it processed at 50 and declined because of the range of subject matter and lighting conditions the film was exposed in. Most of the coastal photos that I took were metered at EV14 and I used a 40mm Distagon CFE IF lens.

Thank you in advance for your time and patience.

Steve
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
The only benefit to using ND filters to "cut down on the light coming into the camera" is that you will use larger apertures (to obtain/maintain a proper exposure) thereby having less depth of field, or slower shutter speeds which can render motion blur. (If that's what you want.)
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,539
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Before suggesting solutions or asking opinions it might be worth your while to explain a bit more about your disappointment. What is disappointing? What do you want to change?

And why would the lab ask such a question; every lab I've ever used assumes normal development unless specifically directed otherwise.
 

moto-uno

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2009
Messages
585
Location
Burnaby, B.C
Format
Medium Format
Possibly , if any of these photos are near the sea , you might wish to try an 81A or 81B filter .
Not a measurable reduction in light , but it could offer an improvement in the light the film sees .
Peter
 
OP
OP

SteveT

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2016
Messages
16
Location
South East England
Format
35mm
I will look into your advice Peter. Thanks for that. In answer to your question BrianShaw the prints seemed a little washed out and the colour saturation not as rich as I had hoped which was why I had chosen Provia 100 in the first place. The fastest shutter speed the Hasselblad does is 1/500 and I was thinking that perhaps it was not quite fast enough for the amount of light that was around. The images that I was after were all static and I was not looking to create motion blur or candy floss type water effects.

Steve
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,539
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Another idea to try, if not doing so already: use an effective lens shade/hood.

And if you want punchy colors, try some Ektar 100.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
You mention the limit of 1/500sec. If this is causing you to over-expose colour negative film, the result will be the opposite of the washed out result you got. Too much light entering the camera is not the problem here, and a ND filter is not the solution.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom