Some of this might be due to the scans.He's quite pleased with the results but a little bit disappointed with the saturation and colors.
Yeah I was expecting a few blurry shots but to be honest even on the remaining 4-5 shots that he's decided not to upload, there aren't any real duffers.The thing that I noticed right away was how well he has taken to manual focus. Tell him "bravo" from me.
He's quite pleased with the results but a little bit disappointed with the saturation and colors. But the light up here in Northern England is pretty shocking during December->February: the sun is really low, and the options are either (a) really harsh light with deep strong shadows (on the rare occasions in winter when when we actually get cloudless skies) or (b) the kind of dull washed-out dreariness you see on these photos on the cloudy days.
Would help with the colors probably but up here would definitely drop pretty much every shot into tripod territory. Of course another option instead of a tripod would be 400ISO filmpolariser not help?
Teach him Sunny 16 for the rest of the world and Sunny 11 for the British Isles and teach him to set the camera on manual.
looks like he's on his way. what a good start! bravoFollowing my previous threads concerning choosing and buying my 15 year old son's first MF film camera, I thought I'd show you the results of his first test roll that he's uploaded to his Flickr account:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/157384976@N05/sets/72157690670159545/with/38898164881/
All shots were taken in Program exposure mode, though with some shots he made use of the aperture ring to control the DOF
Get one of these https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_...pod.TRS0&_nkw=manfrotto+3216+monopod&_sacat=0 or the UK equivalent of a Manfrotto 3216 monopod, no head needed. It will tame those dim days to 1/2 second shutter speed.its a bit too tricky for sunny 11 at the minute - we have fog rolling in, lots of broken cloud where it can be half way bright one minute then dark again the next and one freak day when bizarrely it was 1/15th f2.8 iso 400 at midday for an hour or so and all street lights were on. Bit too tricky to be learning manual in dead of a temperamental British winter!
Following my previous threads concerning choosing and buying my 15 year old son's first MF film camera, I thought I'd show you the results of his first test roll that he's uploaded to his Flickr account:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/157384976@N05/sets/72157690670159545/with/38898164881/
All shots were taken in Program exposure mode, though with some shots he made use of the aperture ring to control the DOF
LOL! Yeah I guess it proves there's only a finite number of photo opportunities with a bench sat on a grassy trail before at least two of them start to look alike.Looks as though he's off to a good beginning! Funny, that first shot of a trail and a bench looks like something taken on a trail right near me -- but since it appears the Atlantic Ocean is between us, I guess it wasn't!
Yeah I've been thinking of teaching him how to do long-exposure night shots, such as headlight trails from a busy twisty road. Bit clichéd but nearly always looks good. And the benefit of having a DSLR in the house is it makes such an excellent practice-tool for such techniques because the results are instant, so less wasted shots on the real camera.Shots all in focus and properly exposed? That's a win.
Color is going to be dull because colors this time of year are dull...get him a tripod and have fun with some long exposures at night. Those look amazing on film.
Yeah I've been thinking of teaching him how to do long-exposure night shots, such as headlight trails from a busy twisty road. Bit clichéd but nearly always looks good. And the benefit of having a DSLR in the house is it makes such an excellent practice-tool for such techniques because the results are instant, so less wasted shots on the real camera.
I know exactly what you mean.Don't worry about cliche. Getting those headlights on film is really cool, has a very different look than digital. In my opinion any bright light looks cooler on film, it sorta glows. It's far more flat looking on digital. Film makes it look laser like? Light sabery? Can't really explain it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?