My new (to me) Zorki 4… lenses?

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Hello, all!

Got me a Zorki 4 last week and already feel the 50mm Industar that came with it won’t get much use… I like to shoot wider.

I’m looking for good glass for it, but I am not sure about what to get, so I came here for advice.

I’ve been looking into Voigtländer’s offerings in the 35mm focal length. So far, the Skopars caught my eye as cheap enough. Ultrons and Noktons are pricier, but still orders of magnitude cheaper than Leica glass.

Yes, it would be a good joke on fellow photographers: using a Leica lens on a cheap Russian camera. But the joke would be pretty much on me and, especially, my bank account.

What would you guys recommend me (except for getting a better camera)?

Cheers,
Flavio
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,524
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I had a Canon 35mm 2.0 it was a really sharp lens, tended to flare, needs a decent lens hood. There also a 2.8 and 3.2.
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Paul Howell said:
I had a Canon 35mm 2.0 it was a really sharp lens, tended to flare, needs a decent lens hood. There also a 2.8 and 3.2.
Click to expand...

Cool! I’ve found a handful of these on the big auction site, all of them cheaper than the cheapest Color Skopar I had found. The f/3.2 ones are Serenars.

These also a metric crapload of 50mm f/1.8 Serenars for dirt cheap. I might want to replace my Industar with better glass too.

I’ll keep an eye open for these.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,524
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I had both Canon and Leica glass, unless you're shooting microfiche film you wouldn't be able to tell any difference between the 2, Canon like Leica made a wide range of lens in a given format the 35 raged from a 1.5 to a 3.2. But remember these Canon and Leica screw mount lens are not going on 60 years old, newer glass will have better coating, still at the price point.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,281
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
LTM Voigtlander is really well made. Get some of the 1990s lenses on Ebay for great prices. Also you can find silver finish that may not be available today.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,223
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
Have you tried the Industar? FSU lenses can be outstanding and they are very inexpensive- why not try them? Jupiter 9 85mm, Jupiter 12 35mm, Orion 28mm- lots of Inexpensive options. And they work properly on the Zorki body, the helicals for Leica and Contax (FSU ltm) are slightly different
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Oh, my...

If you think you could use non FSU fast lenses on Z4, you are still in rainbow unicorn lalaland. Sorry.

Your best bet is J-3. If it is actually going to align with your particular Z4. And nothing else for fast.

Have you got any developed visible exposures from this camera yet? With this old and FSU, you have to hold your breath until you'll see actual exposures. Look for uneven ones...
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
btaylor said:
And they work properly on the Zorki body, the helicals for Leica and Contax (FSU ltm) are slightly different
Click to expand...

Mmmmmmm, I didn’t know anything about that. Thanks for the heads up!

I have nothing against the FSU lenses. I just thought: “if I’m going to spend money, make sure it’s well spent.”
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Ko.Fe. said:
If you think you could use non FSU fast lenses on Z4, you are still in rainbow unicorn lalaland. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Read the subject: “My new (to me) Zorki 4”. I failed to mention I don’t know jack about rangefinders (I did it in another thread). So, you see now why I’m asking?

Ko.Fe. said:
Have you got any developed visible exposures from this camera yet? With this old and FSU, you have to hold your breath until you'll see actual exposures. Look for uneven ones...
Click to expand...

Yes, the camera needs a CLA. The curtain is sticking, specially with low shutter speeds.
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,832
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
35mm lens on a Zorki 4 would mean external viewfinder.

If you want to go that route anyway, why not a Jupiter 12? After a dozen rolls, you should know if it fits your need or not.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
I'm not checking every thread here. Sorry. Only those showing on the main page.

You can't use modern lenss you have mentioned on this body. You would have to try to modify thier shimming at least.
CLA of Z4 is another miracle these days. Most if not all won't touch it.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,442
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Ko.Fe. said:
You can't use modern lenss you have mentioned on this body. You would have to try to modify thier shimming at least.
Click to expand...

It should be OK for wide-angle lenses. E.g., Cosina/Voigtländer sells their wides for dual use on Contax and Nikon bodies, which have the same alignment difference.

That said, the Jupiter-12 is a nice lens.

-NT
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Ko.Fe. said:
CLA of Z4 is another miracle these days. Most if not all won't touch it.
Click to expand...

There are some crazy technicians here in Brazil. Some of them though are very trustworthy… the others just plain crazy (and cheap).

I would like to get this camera in good working condition and have some fun shooting with it. Although I still haven’t felt any advantage in handling, compared to my Nikon FM2.
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
Dali said:
35mm lens on a Zorki 4 would mean external viewfinder.

If you want to go that route anyway, why not a Jupiter 12? After a dozen rolls, you should know if it fits your need or not.
Click to expand...

I have no problem with the external viewfinder. I would have to focus with the built-in one then compose on the external one… it’s kind of a hassle, but one I can live with.

I think I’m gonna try one of the Jupiters and see where I go from there.
 
OP
OP

fdonadio

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,072
Location
Berlin, DE
Format
Multi Format
ntenny said:
It should be OK for wide-angle lenses. E.g., Cosina/Voigtländer sells their wides for dual use on Contax and Nikon bodies, which have the same alignment difference.
Click to expand...

Is there a place where I can find information about these differences? If I understand it, there are more than subtle differences in rangefinder coupling, right?
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,442
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital

Crazy or good doesn't mean anything. Those cameras are so badly build, even if you do everything right, they won't give correct exposures.
Maybe your Z4 just needs curtains retention and it will work for few months and then same is going to happen.

FSU cameras can't offer any advantage in handling. Especially Z4 with its cruel shutter speed dial.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
ntenny said:
It should be OK for wide-angle lenses. E.g., Cosina/Voigtländer sells their wides for dual use on Contax and Nikon bodies, which have the same alignment difference.

That said, the Jupiter-12 is a nice lens.

-NT
Click to expand...

OP is asking about faster lenses in 35 FOV. Not about CV CS 21/4.

Have you ever screw in non FSU lens in FSU or in opposite?
It gives funny feeling and force has to be applied, because LTM threads are not exactly the came.

CV made C/N mount lenses matching C/N cameras mounts. It has nothing to do with what is OP is after.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,442
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Ko.Fe. said:
OP is asking about faster lenses in 35 FOV. Not about CV CS 21/4.
Click to expand...

My experience is that the helical difference is OK on a 35/2.5, but I haven’t done rigorous testing or anything.

Have you ever screw in non FSU lens in FSU or in opposite?
It gives funny feeling and force has to be applied, because LTM threads are not exactly the came.
Click to expand...

I think this might be down to the infamous FSU quality control and sample variance. I’ve used a couple of FSU lenses on a Bessa-R and several standard LTM lenses on FSU bodies (before I knew about the helical difference) and didn’t run into thread problems. But I’ve got a Contax-mount Helios lens that can barely be mounted, and I don’t have any trouble believing that there are lenses and bodies around with out-of-spec threads.

CV made C/N mount lenses matching C/N cameras mounts. It has nothing to do with what is OP is after.
Click to expand...

It’s the same difference between helicals as using Leica-spec lenses on FSU bodies or vice versa. A focal length/aperture combination that’s functionally interchangeable between Nikon and Contax should also be functionally interchangeable between Leica and FSU.

-NT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…