My first few 4x5 slides scanned and posted

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 6
  • 6
  • 111
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 93
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 133
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 7
  • 2
  • 144

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,054
Messages
2,785,462
Members
99,792
Latest member
sepd123
Recent bookmarks
0

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Hello friends.
I was away from the community for a fairly long time (was busy with study, work, family), was hardly having any time to pull out my Shen at all.
Now it seems will be having some time to devote to my passion, so managed to scan few of my slides shot several months ago. These are the first scans out of my 4x5 at all since I begun my LF adventure about a year and half ago.
Scanned by Imacon (about 200 MB at 8 bit per channel, very slightly post-processed for web).
Kindly invite your guys to my gallery:

www.zabrovsky.com -> galleries -> LF

Your opinions are most welcomed.

P.S. the slides may appear a bit to overexp. side - I apparently overestimated my polarizer factor (took 1 2/3 stops compensation) due to lack of experience, now I take a half stop less (1 1/3 stops).

Thanks in advance, Alex
 

noseoil

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
2,887
Location
Tucson
Format
Multi Format
Alex, my usual compensation for a polarizer is 1 2/3 stops, or 2 stops with an 81b warming filter & polarizer. How did you meter this amount? Do you use a spot meter? tim

P.S. My software doesn't seem to let me click on links on your web page properly. Is it my computer here at home? Will try at work next week.
 
OP
OP

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Hi Tim, thanks for your prompt reponse.
Well, I used to think my polarizer "eats up" also about 1 2/3 stops (I have Heliopan multicoated) so I compensated accordingly.
I always meter by my Zone modified Pentax Digital spotmeter. After realizing the signs of moderate overexp. I conducted a brief evaluation of my polarizer factor taking few measurements of the same subject through and without polarizer and it indeed indicated 1 1/3 - 1 1/2 difference, more likely 1 1/3.

Just checked my web page once again, in both FireFox/Mozilla (my regular browser) and IE - all seems to work fine, no problems.
 

noseoil

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
2,887
Location
Tucson
Format
Multi Format
Alex, I generally use my spot meter to test filters and go with these results. My method is to meter through the filter and use a gray card as the test subject. This seems to work well enough for me so far. I use 1 2/3 stops above zone 5 for high value placement and let the rest go. This is the maximum amount of overexposure I can use and still retain textures in the high values, the upper limit. When I get very confused, I just meter the gray card and expose.

As far as development goes, with B&W there are other considerations which come into play when dealing with print contrast and filters. This is a whole other subject. tim

P.S. I will try the links at work. My computer is old, my software as well.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom