Looks like your filters are not in. ie... printed with 'white light'.
John S
Are you new to making color enlargements?
Is the swirly pattern visible on the prints consistent with the image on the negative?
How are you doing the development; drums, trays, roller transport processor? What development time + temperature?
How was the chemistry stored exactly; you noted duration and time, but not if any oxygen could get to it during storage.
How are you replenishing the developer; i.e. at what rate?
Is there any possibility of cross-contamination of the developer with blix (this would be my first guess as to an explanation of what you're seeing)?
If you develop an unexposed test strip, does it come out perfectly white?No oxygen can get into my storage, I mix my chemicals in water dispensing jugs, so I never actually have to open them and expose them to air
I mix my chemicals in water dispensing jugs like the picture that I attached below. The only time they’re ever exposed to air is when I am mixing them. Otherwise, I keep them sealed in the jug and only pour what I need from the jug. I have one for each separate solution. One for my stock solution one for my working solution. And also each subsequent solution. As for the image, yes, the image is coming out consistent with the negative. It’s just the color that is concerning. I am using a Unicolor drum and mechanical roller, that does the rolling for me. Like I mentioned it is an Arista RA4 kit that I purchased, which included all the chemicals. I have a Cinestill TCS 1000 that i use to heat my chemicals in a water bath. There are several temperatures at which. Arista has recommendations for in the instructions however, I usually go for the developer heated at 95 + .25 degrees Fahrenheit and I let that develop for one minute and 10 seconds, and the blix is able to be heated to a less specific temperature of 85 to 95°F. And then I’d put that on the roller for 60 seconds. After the developer and blix are completed, I let it sit under the faucet of a modest current of running water, same temperature as the Blix, for 2 to 3 minutes. Also, I think it’s worth noting that I am adding replenishment solution to my working solution of both the developer and the blix. The ratio varies, depending on how much paper I am planning on developing, however, with this particular session, the measurements were 120 mL of working solution to 16.6 mL of replenishment and 120 mL of working solution to 22.2 mL of replenishment respectively. And just in case anyone thinks this is important to add, I followed the directions that came with the Arista RA-4 kit very closely, and more importantly I have had success, prior to this with the same kit, so I don’t think I did any of the initial mixing incorrectly. I highly doubt there are any issues with cross-contamination, I am extremely careful not to let that happen with any of my print/negative developing chemicals. It has taken me a very long time to locate many of my chemicals and I have spent a lot of money on these chemicals, and I am extremely careful with them. I don’t do a whole lot of color printing, which is the only t reason I purchased the Arista RA-4 kit, otherwise, I strictly purchase individual, laboratory grade,(mostly Kodak) chemicals for all of my other developing. I am very particular about my chemicals, so, as I said, this is highly doubtful. But, I can’t rule it out 100%. I have not tried developing in unexposed test strip as you suggested, I will have to try this and get back to you.Is the swirly pattern visible on the prints consistent with the image on the negative?
How are you doing the development; drums, trays, roller transport processor? What development time + temperature?
How was the chemistry stored exactly; you noted duration and time, but not if any oxygen could get to it during storage.
How are you replenishing the developer; i.e. at what rate?
Is there any possibility of cross-contamination of the developer with blix (this would be my first guess as to an explanation of what you're seeing)?
If you develop an unexposed test strip, does it come out perfectly white?
The Durst M605 has a lever about two inches long on the left side of the filter head.
It is used to remove all of the filters from the light path whilst focussing and composing the image.
After years of using the M605 I still occasionally forget to put the filters back into the light path before making the exposure, so I tend not to use the filter lever if possible.
Good Luck with the printing.
Looks like your filters are not in. ie... printed with 'white light'.
John S
Looks like your filters are not in. ie... printed with 'white light'.
John S
Your theory sounds interesting, but how is this possible? You mean the enlarger just doesn’t have the intended filters in at all?
Most color enlargers have a knob or a lever that moves the color filters out of the light path. Some people like this for focusing or printing in B&W without the dichroic filters. In some cases, it is easy to hit this lever without realizing it.
Most color enlargers have a knob or a lever that moves the color filters out of the light path. Some people like this for focusing or printing in B&W without the dichroic filters. In some cases, it is easy to hit this lever without realizing it.
Check as well that nothing in the head is loose or has become dislodged or disconnected.
Very red prints might come from the cyan filter coming loose from the control dial and falling into the light path. If the bulb location has been moved from where it should be, that could cause a problem too.
Thats a good point, adding Cyan makes a "white" light correct?
Hmmm I see, I will definitely do a check up on my enlarger, maybe that’s what it is. I’ll let you know.Check as well that nothing in the head is loose or has become dislodged or disconnected.
Very red prints might come from the cyan filter coming loose from the control dial and falling into the light path. If the bulb location has been moved from where it should be, that could cause a problem too.
This is the jug
Could you elaborate please?
No - a blue-green light.
And if you increase the amount of cyan, your print will move toward being more red, because red and cyan are complementary.
Yes, to color I am still fairly new. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve more experience than a proper novice, but I am definitely still learning. I’ve been at it not quite a year.
Just to update everyone, I found out what the issue was.Most color enlargers have a knob or a lever that moves the color filters out of the light path. Some people like this for focusing or printing in B&W without the dichroic filters. In some cases, it is easy to hit this lever without realizing it.
Just to update everyone, I found out what the issue was.
It turns out, I had several issues, most important one being, what rcphoto suggested. I thought I had checked this, but when I went back to look once more, it turns out that there are two levers, one on the front and one on the left side. I had checked the one on the left already and made sure it was in the correct position however, I hadn't realized that there was one on the front, as well. The one on the front, was indeed, turned in the wrong direction. It was in the "in" position when it should have been pointed towards the "out" position. It was the small lever on the front.
Thank you all, but a special thank you to rcphoto. You were right, man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?