Roger Cole
Allowing Ads
I have a 1l bottle I picked up a couple months ago. After snooping around on apug I decided to decant it into smaller bottles, 1 500ml, 2 250ml then mix from concentrate. Haven't had any problems yet!
So far I'm having great luck with dil b.
never had any developer change color and oxidize too crazily. Maybe some ilfosol 3 I had turned a little brown before it died but I've mostly worked with Xtol prior and used it up before it spoiled most of the time.
There are films that would require less than five minutes in DilB. That runs the risk of uneven developing. Further dilution and prolonged development lessen that risk.
Hi,I have resolved to start using it more and will try to do just that using the 1:49 dilution which I prefer to use over the official established dilutions.
Neil.
If you are happy, why change?After god knows how many rolls of film developed, I finally drained my bottle of HC-110. I shoot a lot of film and it took me maybe 1.5 years to use up a whole 1 liter bottle (I used dilution E 99% of the time). When purchased the syrup had a light yellow or amber color to it. The sample I pulled from the bottle yesterday was a very very dark, almost electric red color. The amount of oxidation that had taken place was quite severe. The viscosity of the fluid was noticeably higher than fresh fluid. It almost seemed a semi-gel at times. Regardless, the negatives that I made yesterday looked spectacular. I dont think you can find a more bullet proof developer than HC-110. I stored the stuff in the original bottle, making no effort at all to control oxygen content at all.
Next up, I'm going to try the Ilford equivalent to HC-110. I'm told that the results that this developer produces are the same.
Hi,
I have been using XTOL but just bought a bottle of HC-110 to see if I get some more contrast / deeper blacks with developing and not through adjustments in Lightroom. dil B dev times seem too short. Does the dilution you are using 1:49 mean 1+49?
how do the dev times differ in percentage from the official dilution E 1:47, so I can adjust for films that have no 1:49 dev times listed on the internet.
thank you!
stefano
Ha.. gotta do something with my marbles ...
Does not really matter -- just do one way or the other (add 1 to 49, or add 1 to 48), but pick one and stick with it....Does the dilution you are using 1:49 mean 1+49?...
stefano
Dear Ratty You may not be satisfied with the shelf life of the Ilford product. It is not anywhere near as long lasting as HC-110.
How long does it last? I was going to switch since B&H hasn't shipped the Kodak HC-110 since the bottle change. As long as the Ilford stuff keeps at least a year after opening that's all I ask.Dear Ratty You may not be satisfied with the shelf life of the Ilford product. It is not anywhere near as long lasting as HC-110.
How long does it last? I was going to switch since B&H hasn't shipped the Kodak HC-110 since the bottle change. As long as the Ilford stuff keeps at least a year after opening that's all I ask.
Not picking on you Gerald but price competitiveness varies across the world, UK prices:
ILFORD ILFOTEC HC DEVELOPER Size: 1 ltr £23.68
Kodak Professional HC110 Film Developer 1L96654 Cost: £27.98
ILFOTEC HC STORAGE
Full, unopened bottles of ILFOTEC HC concentrates stored in cool conditions, 5–20ºC (41–68ºF), will keep indefinitely.
Once opened use completely to make stock solutions. If stored in cool conditions, 5–20ºC (41–68ºF), ILFOTEC HC stock solutions will keep for up to :- 6 months in full tightly capped bottles 2 months in half full bottles.
http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/2011427105392231.pdf
Is this where confusion arises? Ilford are adamant we cannot accurately measure small volumes and recommend a stock solution be used which of course has a reduced shelf life.
I don't see on the safety sheet where it says it is water based, other than stating it is 100% water soluble which is not the same of course.
http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/2015529947531453.pdf
Revision Date 14/05/2015 Revision 12 Supersedes date 05/11/2014
HOWEVER it would not be the first time that an MSDS contains an error.
Indeed they are constantly being re-written as requirements change.
I still think it is related to solubility, the one I quote mentions it in relation to spills affecting water courses etc.
Still we take comfort from the indefinitely.
In the UK medicines legislation requires an expiry date on every licensed product, with a specified maximum, thus medical Oxygen in a cylinder has an expiry date, there is no end to correctness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?