Must-have Minolta manual focus (MC/MD/etc) lenses?

Vernal Dark

A
Vernal Dark

  • 1
  • 1
  • 11
WPPD-2025-TULIPS

A
WPPD-2025-TULIPS

  • 2
  • 0
  • 60
Deco.jpg

H
Deco.jpg

  • Tel
  • Apr 29, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 36
Foggy pathway

H
Foggy pathway

  • 3
  • 1
  • 73
Holga Fomapan 400

H
Holga Fomapan 400

  • 1
  • 0
  • 59

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,471
Messages
2,759,658
Members
99,380
Latest member
Rimmer
Recent bookmarks
0

viridari

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Raleigh, NC
Format
Hybrid
My old man gave me his old Minolta X-700 and some really forgettable lenses (Albinar!) Since I don't have any decent glass for it and I'd like to shoot some more 35mm, I'm wondering what some of your favorite "must have" lenses are for this system, and maybe post some examples of your favorite photos taken with the lenses that you recommend.

The only lens I have that looks like it might be worth keeping is a Minolta 50mm f/2 MD (49mm filter). I don't see myself wanting anything much longer than maybe 135mm but I could see wanting some wider glass.

I shoot a lot of models, portraiture, urban architecture, rural decay, and a little bit of landscapes.
 

d.sge

Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
16
Location
New York, NY
Format
35mm
The 20 or 21/2.8, 24/2.8 (optionally, the vfc version instead), 28/2.0, 35/1.8, 58/1.2, 85/1.7, 100/2.0, 135/2.0 are all very nice and expensive as compared to their slower cousins.

The Rokkor Files and Minolta Manual Focus group offer a lot of information, too, if that's of any help.
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,742
Format
35mm
Must Have Minolta Manual Focus Lenses

The X-700 is a beautiful camera. I have four of them. There are many MC and MD lenses to choose from and even some pre-MC lenses. Some of my favorites: 28/2.5 MC, 35/1.8 MC, 50/1.4 MC Rokkor-X, 50/1.7 MC Rokkor-X, 50.1.7 MD, 100/2.5 MC, 200/3.5 MC Rokkor-X, 50/3.5 MD, 50/3.5 MC Celtic, 35/2.8 MD Celtic (1st version), 28/2.8 MD Celtic (1st version). The 28/2.5 MC usually has the tan color and needs the UV light treatment but is quite sharp and suitable for b&w work even without the treatment. The 50/1.7 MD is sharper than the 50/2 MD and sells for very little. Among collectors and users there are two schools of thought on the late MD lenses. Some people like them because they have the latest coating and are typically smaller and lighter. Others prefer the late MC Rokkor-X and early MD Rokkor-X because there is more metal in them and they feel better made. The 100/4 Macro lens and the earlier 100/3.5 Macro have a following. If you have the need for them there are the more expensive and exotic Rokkors like the 35/2.8 shift lens, the 200/2.8, the 50/1.2, I think there was an 85/2.8 Soft Focus lens, the 85/1.7 and later 85/2, the 7.5mm fisheye and others.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
Vivitar makes some good MD glass. I have a 28 f/2.8 that has been a mainstay in my bag for years. 135, stay away from Celtic lenses. Nothing but trouble for me. Go Rokkor or Makinon (I got one this year and it is SWEET!). 50 f/1.4 will put you back a good bit but well worth having. Zooms are good. I have had a couple 28-70's and I have a great 70-210 Quantaray (another notable off brand MD). But there are uber zooms out there as well. I had a 28-200 a couple of years back and gave it to a friend. Lots of coverage but lots of poundage as well.
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,044
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
Any MC or MD lens will work on the X700, but you will want the MD to fully utilize the program functions of the X700.
 
OP
OP
viridari

viridari

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Raleigh, NC
Format
Hybrid
Great stuff, guys. Thanks.

I got on Flickr & did some searches for these lenses. The 24mm f/2.8 was consistently producing results that knocked my socks off. That's going to have to be one of the first.
 

Vonder

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
1,237
Location
Foo
Format
35mm
Be prepared to pay

Great stuff, guys. Thanks.

I got on Flickr & did some searches for these lenses. The 24mm f/2.8 was consistently producing results that knocked my socks off. That's going to have to be one of the first.

These lenses are legendary. And priced so. I used to desire one but at the time, they were going for over $200 on eBay and I never had that much free cash.

Another lens that I adore is the 35-70mm macro zoom. I've had mine since 1985 and it produces very nice results, especially at f8. Then again, all lenses will do nicely at f8. You should give the Albinar lenses a try. Unless they have obvious defect like scratches or fungus or oily aperture blades you should be able to get very nice images with them. Of course, lens snobs will look down upon you, and make rude comments behind your back. Or to your face. Isn't it worth a shot to try out the lenses you have and see if you can't find a diamond in the rough?
 
OP
OP
viridari

viridari

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Raleigh, NC
Format
Hybrid
You should give the Albinar lenses a try.

I have Albinar 28mm f/2.8 Macro and Kiron 70-210mm f/4 Macro. Neither of them came with end caps. The Kiron had a UV filter but the glass behind the UV filter is filthy so I need to clean that up. I need to get caps for both & clean them.

Of course, lens snobs will look down upon you, and make rude comments behind your back.

I show up at strobist meetups with a TLR while everyone else has the DigiWhizBang 3000's. I even show up at fashion shows with antiquated hardware. I'm used to getting funny looks. :wink: In the end, my standing in the local community is based on the images that I produce, and I'm on solid ground there even if I'm using what can often be described as "ghetto gear" (though I doubt Avedon or Newton would have scoffed at some of my hardware hahahahaha)

The 24mm/2.8 is pretty affordable now that I check KEH.
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format
All I know is that I would like to have the MD 85/2, and that they go for more money than I can afford on eBay. The 135s, on the other hand, are very cheap.
 

Excalibur2

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
423
Location
UK
Format
35mm
***The X-700 is a beautiful camera.***

Indeed, very basic compared to a Canon T90, but the X-700 in one of those cameras that you just like. And I don't know if it's been mentioned but a Tamron adapter is cheap and many of their zooms are good.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

fmajor

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
259
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
OK, here are my picks - I own/use all of these:

1) Minolta MD W Rokkor-X 24mm f2.8 (55mm filter - yes it makes a difference). It's really all that it's cracked up to be
2) Minolta MD W Rokkor 35mm f2.8 (49mm filter) - an amazing walk-around/street lens
3) Minolta MC Rokkor-X PG 50mm f1.4 (55mm filter) - possibly the sharpest 50mm ever made - 'nuff said there
4) Minolta MC Rokkor PF 58mm f1.4 (55mm filter) - my fav for b&w 35mm stuff -simply amazing
5) Minolta MD Tele Rokkor-X 135mm f3.5 (55mm filter) - yep, it's an amazing short tele and super for portraiture

I don't have the following lenses, but believe/have read/seen images/etc that they are truly magnificent:

1) Minolta MC Rokkor-X 85mm f1.7 - excellent portrait length...
2) Minolta MC Rokkor-X 100mm f2.5 - heard its among the sharpest lenses ever made by anyone - again, 'nuff said...
3) Minolta MD 135mm f2.0 - it's the KING of 135mm's!!!!
4) Minolta MD 200mm f2.8 - it's the KING of 200mm's!!!! OK, i've read where the 200mm f4 is a serious contender, but still....

hth,

fm
 
OP
OP
viridari

viridari

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
347
Location
Raleigh, NC
Format
Hybrid
Do any of you have Flickr accounts where I can get a sense of your work with these lenses?
 

fmajor

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
259
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
i do, but only have a few scanned images......

My flickr ID is fmajor007
 

Excalibur2

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
423
Location
UK
Format
35mm

jime11

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2008
Messages
72
Format
Medium Format
***Minolta MC Rokkor PF 58mm f1.4 (55mm filter) - my fav for b&w 35mm stuff -simply amazing***

I have the earlier Minolta auto Rokkor pf 58mm 1:1.4 --- is that the same lens without the mc stop down capability?
 

unohuu

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
480
Location
Minneapolis
Format
35mm
28mm f/2; 58mm f/1.4; 85mm f/1.7; 100mm f/2.5; and 135mm f/2.8.

I own these all except the 85mm which I regret selling.

Luke
 

fmajor

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
259
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
Hey viridari, make sure you do a search on people.... I just searched myself and whaddya know - i found me!!!
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
3) Minolta MC Rokkor-X PG 50mm f1.4 (55mm filter) - possibly the sharpest 50mm ever made

This is the one I have. It's sharp allright!

My other Rokkor lenses are the slower f3.5 versions of the 28mm and 135mm. Still nice though.

I would like an 85mm or a 100mm (or both!).

I also have a Vivitar Series 1 28mm - 105mm in MC mount which I need to try out.


Steve.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,146
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
So many to choose from so I will mention two that I had that really stood out:
Minolta MC Rokkor PF 58mm f1.4 (55mm filter)
Minolta MC Rokkor 21mm f2.8

Both have been mentioned before several time in this thread.

Steve
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom