DougGrosjean
Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2006
- Messages
- 341
- Format
- Medium Format
I *think* that's the type of film. It's a 320-asa b/w film, that the local photo store sold me. I just wanted something to try in my new-to-me Burke & James press camera, it was cheaper than T-Max, so I bit.
I've got b/w souping experience in 35mm and 120 format. But in 4x5, the problem I'm running into is that unexposed areas never become clear. They look like coffee with cream.
I did get one batch of 6 negs where the un-exposed areas, using the Yankee tank and Ilfosol S - but got streaks. After that I tried Folgernol, D-76, Microdol, T-Max.... all the same. Tried going back to the Ilfosol-S (it's rare in the area where I live) and tray processing, and ended up with pink instead of clear un-exposed areas. With tray processing, I've gotten to where I can soup them and get decent density with no scratches - but still have the mud in the un-exposed areas.
I can scan the negs as if they're paper negs on a flatbed if they don't clear up, but shoot - the quality / resolution is a bit poor, with lo-contrast.
Any ideas?
I've got b/w souping experience in 35mm and 120 format. But in 4x5, the problem I'm running into is that unexposed areas never become clear. They look like coffee with cream.
I did get one batch of 6 negs where the un-exposed areas, using the Yankee tank and Ilfosol S - but got streaks. After that I tried Folgernol, D-76, Microdol, T-Max.... all the same. Tried going back to the Ilfosol-S (it's rare in the area where I live) and tray processing, and ended up with pink instead of clear un-exposed areas. With tray processing, I've gotten to where I can soup them and get decent density with no scratches - but still have the mud in the un-exposed areas.
I can scan the negs as if they're paper negs on a flatbed if they don't clear up, but shoot - the quality / resolution is a bit poor, with lo-contrast.
Any ideas?