Moving from 35mm rangefinder to 6x6 TLR (Rolei GX)

[RezaLoghme]

After some insight I gained about 6x6 TLRs being ideal for protraits of people I am now thinking about dumping my M6 and related gear in exchange for a 6x6 TLR namely the Rolei GX. Has anyone ever made such a move, and if so, how was it for you:

- did your image quality improve (as per the larger negative)
- did your models/subjects prefer the "stealth" shoot from the hip WLF style
- did you make a profit or loss from selling M cameras in exchange for a Rolei GX

Also wondering whether the standard GX is enough or if its worth going for the grey or lizard ones (not sure what they are called like).

 

[GregY]

RL, grey or lizard are vanity options. BTW, personally I would choose a more classic older Rolleiflex rather than a GX.
As far as model's opinion about your camera, .....it has no impact on the final image.

 

[RezaLoghme]

You think a lesser model will be fine? or even a Yashica 6x6 in terms of Image Quality

 

[ntenny]

They’re very different cameras, and some people like TLRs and others don’t. I love them, but experiment before committing.

-NT

 

[Paul Howell]

I shoot 35mm and MF, 6X6, TLR and SLR. With modern film, up to 8X10 I don't think you will see much difference, unless you print square you are really shooting 6X4.5 at 11X14 you will start to notice the difference of the larger negative. When shooting Portraits I tend to a eye level viewfinder on my SLR, I use Yashica TRLs which the only option for eye level viewing is the sports finder. In terms of cost and functionality I would think about a Mamyia 220, a bit heavier than a Rollie, very good 80mm 2.8 standard lens, then wide to tele for the price a Rolli.

 

[Michael Howard]

Boxxy couldn't troll this any better...