Donald Qualls
Subscriber
Seems fairly basic and obvious how -- make a lens board attached to an extension tube, of length suitable for the focal length, and treat it like large format lens. Lock it open on B or T for focus and composition, stop down and close shutter, cock shutter, fire the body, fire the shutter, then cock the body and advance the film before opening the shutter for the next cycle.
Question is, what would be the advantages? Design the lens board for it, and you can have shifts; and you can use focal lengths and lens types Mamiya never offered -- 105mm, 120mm, 135mm, 150mm (likely anything longer than about 90mm would work with a short enough extension tube or mounted on a body cap). Maybe just an exercise in adding versatility to a body that can already shoot three frame formats (four if you count 35mm sprocket panoramic) with something like eight different lenses, plus teleconverters and macro rings.
Do I need to mount a 105 mm when I already have a 90mm and can easily get a 127mm? No. Do I need a Tessar type or triplet or Rapid Rectlinear or whatever when I've already got whatever (assymmetrical double Gauss?) the 90mm lens is? No. Then again, do I need cameras in current and obsolete formats from 16mm to 4x5, including multiples in most of those? Of course not.
Has anyone tried this, or something similar? It's kind of in the same class as the new 3D printed medium format designs, only MUCH heavier, and an SLR.
Question is, what would be the advantages? Design the lens board for it, and you can have shifts; and you can use focal lengths and lens types Mamiya never offered -- 105mm, 120mm, 135mm, 150mm (likely anything longer than about 90mm would work with a short enough extension tube or mounted on a body cap). Maybe just an exercise in adding versatility to a body that can already shoot three frame formats (four if you count 35mm sprocket panoramic) with something like eight different lenses, plus teleconverters and macro rings.
Do I need to mount a 105 mm when I already have a 90mm and can easily get a 127mm? No. Do I need a Tessar type or triplet or Rapid Rectlinear or whatever when I've already got whatever (assymmetrical double Gauss?) the 90mm lens is? No. Then again, do I need cameras in current and obsolete formats from 16mm to 4x5, including multiples in most of those? Of course not.
Has anyone tried this, or something similar? It's kind of in the same class as the new 3D printed medium format designs, only MUCH heavier, and an SLR.