would like to gauge interest here
Interest is likely greater than what is apparent. Keep in mind that, if you detail repairs here now, those details are available in the future. I think there is a lot of value in your posts.
if you feel compelled to write, then write.
I think feedback is important, even if it's not always pleasant.I've posted minor repair reports and had little response. Which I take to mean that no one needed that particular 'lesson,' that's all.
I'd also think about a more structured way to present these reports? I don't know if this site is the place to do it. Maybe there is a repair web site that would give you a place? It's be great if your audience was wider. Not because there are hundreds waiting to do what you do, but because that one person needing that one photo might not find you here.
I read your threads but don't comment very often. I don't recall if you've done one with the Minolta X-570 but that is one I am interested in. Despite my interest I haven't tried any repairs yet because I think it'll be a difficult diagnosis and repair, and I don't have the right tools yet. (I have a working X-570 except it won't fire an external flash, so I need to figure out what the cause is and the official service manual wasn't very helpful. Maybe the SPT journals have something useful).
Very good reports. But I’m more into mechanical cameras of pre-1975 (approx) era.
Also, those types of posts do not really invite much in the way of feedback - they are not meant to. They are more like manuals, which by their nature are not interactive.
This would make sense as a collaborative effort, e.g. with an electronics engineer, to raise the standard and the usefulness.This might have particular value if edited into camera-specific repair guides or collections of similar models, possibly as print-on-demand publications.
I think you can only be motivated to work where you're emotionally connected.But *what* you choose to repair matters too! It's possible that you will help to popularize cameras like the Canon T90, but there are no guarantees. Canon AE-1 and related Canon models ought to be a more popular choice.
I read most, if not all, of your repair posts and find them to be an excellent resource.
I will probably never attempt repairs at the level you are doing, but it is encouraging to know that such information is being made available.
Thank you!
It's reassuring to know that there aren't endless ways to construct an SLR, and that's why there are similarities between the different models.I have no particular interest in Canon A series 35mm cameras - BUT, I do appreciate the insights into how the equipment is built and their repair. While I may never need the specific information, the principles and process of the repair goes to inform my own approach to my own projects. I hope I am never too old to learn.
If someone is interested in attempting any sort of repair this information is very important. Even if someone like me is probably not going to attempt a complicated electronic repair, maybe just seeing how to get the base plate off etc can be very helpful.
Your articles are a unique and valuable resource. The more details, the better. If collected, edited, and well-organized, it could be made into a successful book.
Yes. At the very least, it can serve as a journal of your work for yourself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?