- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
You've still got it all wrong, John haha lolololo haha omg
It's the beat-up expensive gear that makes you look cool because it means you've shot millions of pictures. And as everyone knows, the more film used, the better the photographer.
Baboons could replace most politicians.
But PETA wouldn't like us putting them is suits...
But PETA wouldn't like us putting them is suits...
But PETA wouldn't like us putting them in suits...
is that the reason one of my favorite tv shows as a kid went off the air ( lancelot link secret chimp ) ?
You've still got it all wrong, John haha lolololo haha omg
It's the beat-up expensive gear that makes you look cool because it means you've shot millions of pictures. And as everyone knows, the more film used, the better the photographer.
This is getting tiresome. If one has no need of better gear then don't buy it. Or, if one prefers the lower resolution and grainier look of smaller formats then by all means use them. I guess what we've failed to do is define "better". To me "better" usually means higher resolution, finer grain, minimal shadow fogging, highest micro-contrast and pleasant bokeh. This isn't "always" the case... depends on the subject and desired final image.
It's not possible to define 'better' because it's subjective. What you're talking about is technical quality above. Many of us seek other things from our pictures that are less tangible, and those items regarding grain and such are not important.
This is getting tiresome. If one has no need of better gear then don't buy it. Or, if one prefers the lower resolution and grainier look of smaller formats then by all means use them. I guess what we've failed to do is define "better". To me "better" usually means higher resolution, finer grain, minimal shadow fogging, highest micro-contrast and pleasant bokeh. This isn't "always" the case... depends on the subject and desired final image.
O-N-F
have you read what i am writing about in this thread?
it has nothing to do with what you are suggesting it is about.
i couldn't care less if someone upgrades their equipment, gets new bodies or lenses
or whatever ...
what it has to do with is my trying to understand
why someone who barely has a grasp of how to make an exposure
would want to abandon a "lower end learning camera" if i can put it that way
to purchase a camera or system that is the tippity top of the line, thinking it will aid them into making better photographs and being a "photographer"
in my original post it was someone who bought a camera that made 11x14 negatives with a lens that cost
a small fortune, and later on i described a classmate of mine when he was 19 he got rid of his K1000 and used
a high end camera that cost $6000 instead thinking that it would improve his photography.
in both cases the purchases didn't improve their technique or vision, at least when i knew them ..
and i just wondered why they would spend such money on a frivolous thing when they could have learned better with a smaller less expensive camera
that shot film that did not cost as much, and a camera/s that didn't give them the appearance of a seasoned "pro" ... ( and maybe frustration that their end images didn't look professional? )
i know that when i was starting out and was clueless or inept or without any ideas of composition or vision or skills
if i bought a camera that was the top of the line, it wouldn't have done anything to improve anything about my work,
and it might have actually been a hinderance because i would have been afraid maybe i would break it, or be timid with it because
it cost as much as a car.
as i said it has nothing to do with upgrading for need, but for other perhaps aesthetic-reasons i don't "get" and i would love to get it
Absolutely!! Had the show been about an ape running for political office then it would still be on the air... oh wait... it is... during every election. They just use better makeup.
But PETA wouldn't like us putting them in suits...
That is why a gathering of apes is called a "Congress of Apes".
O-N-F
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?