more expensive the gear the better the photographer?

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,249
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
Gear or gray matter....

RalphLambrecht said:
expensive equipment makes you a better photographerbecause, ,spending a lot of money takes all other xcuses away
Click to expand...

Not too far off base! My first 35mm slr was a Praktica LTL with a 28mm, the 50mm, a crappy 135, and a nice tamron 200, plus extension tubes. I made some pretty good shots. Then I sprang for a Pentax MX. Lovely camera! But surely even better gear would improve my shooting. So...the Pentax LX. Now I had a truly professional camera, and the results were all up to .... me! No excuses! I think good gear can improve your pix, in that it can make shooting easier, but in the final result your shots are up to the several inches of gray matter .... between your ears.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,328
Format
4x5 Format
Here's an un-controversial opinion...

There is no direct relationship between how expensive a camera is and the amount of photographic greatness that can be obtained from it.

A good photographer deserves the best. An average photographer sometimes buys the best. As jnanian would suggest, the best didn't change the photographer.

As Maris pointed out, sometimes the average photographer gets moved to improve when they buy an expensive camera.

I would project my own prejudice onto that and say that the average photographer with limited money who buys the best thinking they might improve... will improve, in direct relation to the pain of the expense. One with lots of money will only improve as long as the novelty holds.

Great photographs taken with cheap cameras prove that great photography doesn't require expensive cameras.

I really enjoy the photographs I have taken, and I can't tell how expensive the camera underneath the shot was... But sometimes I wish for easier focusing, better framing and a more reliable shutter.
 

DannL.

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
617
Format
Large Format

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
It's my opinion that once one gets a camera with the features he/she needs and it's well built... that's good enough. The camera 'can be' the cheapest of everything in a photo kit. What's left in equipment is lenses, tripod, meter, etc. A decent tripod and meter can be bought cheaply too, along with most other peripheral gear. The lenses... can be a completely different story though.
 

analoguey

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
1,103
Location
Bangalore, I
Format
Multi Format
Lytro illum?
Sensor size is 5 or 6mpx though -costs as much as an a7r, afaik.

Sent from Tap-a-talk
 
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
analoguey

too bad they don't have a film camera like that, it is the
kind of thing that will tune my ukuele, cook my dinner and tie my shoes
definitely the camera of the future ... who needs to focus anyways, focusing is for chumps.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format

What I need for different situations changes though and the .

One of the best "features" of my Toyo 4x5 or RB67 is that people in front of it darn well know it isn't a "normal" camera, it is special. It changes their attitudes.

Sit me down in front of a 12x20 with a big brass lens and I'm going to behave differently than I will if you point a Nikon at me.

The "features" we need aren't all technical.
 
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid

i like that mark, and it is extremely true.
years afo when i was working for a newspaper
i brought 2 cameras with me specifically on this one assignment photographing
a guy who was raising grubs for some reason ...
i photographed him with a me super and a roll of tmy and it was ok and fun
but then i grabbed the speed graphic and the photographs were COMPLETELY different.

it was a nice feature
john
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,055
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
RalphLambrecht said:
what I need now is a camera with automaticsubject finder,applying all rules of composition,why not?How tough can it beNikon,Canon;anybody?:confused:
Click to expand...

We already have face recognition. How about one that you can show a picture that you like, and the camera software develops an algorithm from that picture and looks for more just like it ...
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Which is the end of your argument that one should do buy a more expensive camera.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,485
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
David Brown said:
We already have face recognition. How about one that you can show a picture that you like, and the camera software develops an algorithm from that picture and looks for more just like it ...
Click to expand...

You're joking, but I bet it could be done. Develop an algorithm for evaluating images compositionally in some reasonable way; seed the camera with a bunch of "known good" images. From then on, its "viewfinder" monitors what it "sees", and when the image is sufficiently similar to the seed images, capture.

You could give each result a thumbs-up or thumbs-down and feed the results into a Bayesian filter, so it continued to refine its criteria.

The tragedy is that I bet the results would be pretty good. I already did my hard time building smart-arse expert systems to imitate art; someone else needs to do this one. But I honestly don't think it would be a hard coding project for someone with good image-processing and machine-learning chops.

-NT
 

OptiKen

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
1,055
Location
Orange County
Format
Medium Format
One of the biggest misconceptions about photography is the belief that the better the camera is, the better the photographs are.
People seem to think that the camera makes the picture.
The camera only records what it sees....what everyone sees when looking at the same thing.
The photographer makes the picture. The camera cannot create art nor can it convey feelings or emotions.
The photographer does.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I am holding out for the film camera that automatically corrects not only the technical aspects, but also improves the composition as the shutter is released. That would show that more expensive equipment can make an improvement.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,663
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Sirius Glass said:
I am holding out for the film camera that automatically corrects not only the technical aspects, but also improves the composition as the shutter is released. That would show that more expensive equipment can make an improvement.
Click to expand...

you and a million others
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Sirius Glass said:
I am holding out for the film camera that automatically corrects not only the technical aspects, but also improves the composition as the shutter is released. That would show that more expensive equipment can make an improvement.
Click to expand...

At that point it should also be a really good salesman. It should have a command of "artspeak"* so you can deal successfully deal with gallery owners and curators.

*"Artspeak" If you don't know what it is, it translates as "baffle them with Bullshit"
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
RalphLambrecht said:
what I need now is a camera with automaticsubject finder,applying all rules of composition,why not? How tough can it be Nikon,Canon;anybody?:confused:
Click to expand...

David Brown said:
We already have face recognition. How about one that you can show a picture that you like, and the camera software develops an algorithm from that picture and looks for more just like it ...
Click to expand...

One problem with that is, no algorithm could possibly know when to bend or break the rules because algorithms have no soul... they can't feel anything.
 

Nuff

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
581
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Multi Format
Old-N-Feeble said:
One problem with that is, no algorithm could possibly know when to bend or break the rules because algorithms have no soul... they can't feel anything.
Click to expand...

Give it some time, soon enough your phone or camera will do the thinking for you. All you will have to do in the future is seat and drool... the camera will go to a place for you, take a photo and bring it back
Dead Link Removed
 

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Nuff said:
Give it some time, soon enough your phone or camera will do the thinking for you. All you will have to do in the future is seat and drool... the camera will go to a place for you, take a photo and bring it back
Dead Link Removed
Click to expand...

That's digital computing. The human brain is an analog computer... FAR better.
 

Ricardo Miranda

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm

Old-N-Feeble

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
6,805
Location
South Texas
Format
Multi Format
Nuff said:
Ah... back to analog and digital Anyway, the cpu is made to mimic neurons and synapses. The current design should be enough to replace most politicians :munch:
Click to expand...

Baboons could replace most politicians.
 

analoguey

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
1,103
Location
Bangalore, I
Format
Multi Format
jnanian said:
analoguey

too bad they don't have a film camera like that, it is the
kind of thing that will tune my ukuele, cook my dinner and tie my shoes
definitely the camera of the future ... who needs to focus anyways, focusing is for chumps.
Click to expand...

Re focusing, Absolutely!
Of course, needs to br backward compatible w 35mm, my Lf and mf lenses.

Sent from Tap-a-talk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…