Of what benefit would there be in shooting glass plates if your camera can also shoot cut-film? Of course I understand the curiosity factor, as well as the desire to use long-discontinued equipment that takes glass plates. Is this the main reason? Are there any "magical" qualities to a modern emulsion coated on glass, as opposed to a film base?
Roger & Vaughn have you ever had a problem of film curl ?
I've only been using LF for a short time(since 1976) but I've never seen or experienced it .
Ian
Yup.Lots and lots of problems -- especially in long exposures (one to 30+ minutes) with 8x10. I have lost quite a few potentially great images...evident in the sharp outer edge of the neg and "double exposed" centers. The problem is increased when pointing the camera down for a shot.
I have also had negs move within the holders (tapping them gently before inserting the holders helps). This would also be reduced with glass plates, as their weight would tend to settle them to the bottom of the holder.
In the enlarger, I have had 4x5 negs "pop" on me during exposures (standard neg carriers with a condenser head -- due to heating up of the film. This is one of the reasons there are glass neg carriers (obviously not needed for glass plate negs).
Vaughn
I believe the posting was asking a question of who would be interested in helping to buy an order of plates, not looking to be convinced of the crazy nature of using plates...snipRobert
If they are not available I would be interested in 9x12cm plates.
I don't have a camera that shoots this size but I am looking for one.
Dear Tim,Thank you Roger. Is there an issue with Slavich QC?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?