jjstafford said:I have no jam-hut (retaining ring) for the lens so I had to use a front flange mount. I even tried using the flange as a jam-nut, but it's just too big. I'd like to find the correct retainer. ...
That's very generous of you, but if you have one I would be happy to trade; is there anything you need? (From you posts, it seems we each have an awful lot of old parts, but not what we really need.)Ole said:If you have a good measurement, or the Rodenstock specification, I can see if I have one. I've just got hold of a HEAP of flanges and retaining rings
gbenaim said:Hello again,
Having considered my options, I'm tending towards getting one of the lighter monorails, like the Sinar F or A, given long lens use, weight, and price considerations. Basically the only field cam that allows some long lens use under $1000, the Shen HAo, is almost as heavy as a light monorail (6lbs SH vs 7lbs Sinar A/F). Since I don't backpack, because of back problems, but rather carry my gear using a little cart, I'm wondering whether it doesn't make more sense for me to go w a monorail.
In fact this is very easy - all my Sinars have clips on their backs to accept a spare bellows as a viewing hood.Frank Petronio said:Finally, if you search, you can find a technique for folding the Sinar into a compact package by unhooking the bellows from one standard and folding them in such a way that they protect the GG.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?