Very interesting formula, and very nice results, but can you provide me some rationale for the addition of Potassium Oxalate?
It was based on this paper:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/recl.19450641004 The concepts that are chained together was a reference that ascorbic acid will prevent sulfite from oxidizing in alkali solution. Then by using that paper about oxalate, I mixed in oxalate to prevent the ascorbic acid from oxidizing as quickly. I'm no chemist so have no real way of testing if my understanding is completely correct.. however, I've done some practical control tests.
* Hydroquinone only -- very short tray life (<1 hour), other pictorial problems with modern papers ( some papers require such low amounts of bromide for infectious development to occur that fog develops, extremely uneven development, too much midtone development, etc)
* hydroquinone+ascorbic acid -- Better tray life (1-1.5 hours), tendency for highlights and midtones to develop too quickly. Sensitive papers from above can become significantly more tolerant of increased bromide levels
* hydroquinone+ascorbic acid+benzotriazole -- in some ways better than oxalate for cold tones, but tray life is no better than the ascorbic acid only combo.
* hydroquinone+ascorbic+oxalate -- best tray life seen (2-3 hours maybe longer, though various bad effects begin to pile up after 2.5 hours on most papers). perfect lith effect on most papers, though some papers can still have a bit more midtone development than I like. (can probably add more oxalate to combat that, or a tiny bit of benzotriazole)
* hydroquinone+oxalate -- no notable difference to tray life (in 2 control tests they gave conflicting results), oxalate in very high amounts (25g+per liter) will slightly restrain midtones, but this effect may be due to contaminants. (iirc I'm using 98% grade with chloride listed as a potential contaminant)
edit: my personal hypothesis of how it works is as so:
Ascorbic acid will prevent sulfite from being oxidized by air/oxygen in water. The sulfite will still be oxidized by recovering oxidized hydroquinone. The ascorbic acid will then be oxidized both by being "sacrificial" for sulfite and also through the natural process of developing the silver halides. When ascorbic acid develops a grain, it will release an acidic somewhat unreactive radical that basically slows hydroquinone development of nearby grains. Oxalate will then react with the fully oxidized ascorbic acid to oxidize itself (supposedly to plain CO2?) and restore the ascorbic acid, but not the radical. I suspect that the ascorbic acid radicals produced in development naturally decay into fully oxidized ascorbic (can't remember chemical name) and/or react with the extremely reactive hydroquinone radicals that are responsible for infectious development. End result is that the ascorbic acid helps to develop the induction image, but then the acidic radicals produced prevent hydroquinone from attacking it too vigorously. The hydroquinone radicals etc do accumulate in shadows though and thus infectious development still happens. The oxalate is still quite a bit of a mystery in how it works though. It definitely has anti-fogging properties since it behaves like benzotriazole, but also will make tray life better.