Mixing chemicals

Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
Volcano Vixen

H
Volcano Vixen

  • 0
  • 0
  • 30
1000002287.jpg

H
1000002287.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 37
Hydro Power Maintenance

H
Hydro Power Maintenance

  • 2
  • 0
  • 71
Bangor Mural.

Bangor Mural.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,536
Messages
2,792,886
Members
99,936
Latest member
Eishwaneeren
Recent bookmarks
0

mikebarger

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2005
Messages
1,937
Location
ottawa kansas
Format
Multi Format
I mixed up a kit from Artcraft of 510 pryo tonight, pretty darn easy.

My question, is there much more savings buying in bulk and weighing out
the chemicals. I have a scale for reloading, I think it ought to work OK.

Interested in the 130 paper developer and maybe the 510 if it can
tear me away from HC110.

Thanks

Mike
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
mikebarger said:
My question, is there much more savings buying in bulk and weighing out
the chemicals. I have a scale for reloading, I think it ought to work OK.

Depends on what you pay for the chemicals. But if you buy in big enough bulk things are usually cheaper. The big saving is in avoiding waste. Only making up what you need not what the package is.
 

srs5694

Member
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
2,718
Location
Woonsocket,
Format
35mm
A lot depends on the quantities in which you buy items, as well as where you buy them from. I created a spreadsheet (note: link is direct to a zip file with OpenOffice.org original and Excel export) that provides cost information on a variety of formulas. That spreadsheet gives me a cost of $2.98 for 100ml of 510 Pyro, or $0.15 per roll (at 250ml of working solution per roll and 1+50 dilution). I don't know what you paid for your Art Craft kit for 510 Pyro, so you'll have to do the comparison yourself. Also, as I said, the final cost will depend on your supplier(s) and quantities for component chemicals.

As a general rule, though, the cost savings can be moderately significant as a percentage of developer cost, but pretty minor considering all the costs involved in shooting a roll of film (the film itself, the other chemistry, wear and tear on the camera, the cost of making prints, etc.). Personally, I think better reasons to mix your own are flexibility in chemistry (with a modest stock of raw chemicals, you can mix a wide variety of developers), the ability to mix whatever amount you want, and the ability to mix fresh whenever needed.
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF
Years ago, when I first started mixing my own, the savings were significant. Today, they're trivial or non-existent (or even negative) in many cases BUT the big advantage is mixing up what you want, when you want it.

There are also a few chemicals where the savings from mixing it yourself are huge, e.g. wash aid.

Cheers,

Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com)
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
I think the most important advantage in mixing your own is the range of processing solutions available to you. If the have the formula you can mix it while there may be no comparable commercial product available.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom