I do not doubt it's potentially a good lens - I'm saying that something seems to be off with my sample. It's perhaps due to errors on my side, but there's probably more.
I have been pixel-peeping the focus on a test shot I did - camera on tripod, f/8, self-timer. This shot has good centre sharpness, and good sharpness towards the right side of the frame. However, sharpness around the left side of the frame is noticeably off. I suspect some sort of misalignment, to do with lens assembly or focus plane or both. The pressure plate seems to be in good condition. I wonder if the camera was badly handled which might have misaligned the lens. Visually, the camera is in truly spectacular condition, and bears no obvious signs of mishandling.
Either way, as it is the pictures are not satisfactory. Pity because I got 38 well exposed shots on my second test roll, suggesting the shutter is doing well for the time being. I might try my luck with another sample as it does seem to have a good form factor, and I can see myself carrying one of these in my pocket at all times.
Thanks both. I have to say I'm almost abandoning the idea that a small point & shoot can act as a compact, high IQ, surrogate for an SLR + prime lens. Admittedly my experience is based on only two cameras, a Yashica T3 (with a Tessar lens) and this Minox. The Yashica works perfectly. The Minox - still not sure but as said I suspect something is faulty.
Either way, neither of those two can even remotely approach what I get with a Nikon F90X + humble AF-D 50mm 1.8 or with my other beater, an Olympus OM2n with a couple of Zuiko primes (28mm f/2.8 and 50mm f/1.8). The OM2n + Zuiko 50mm cost me 90 Euro some years ago and delivers negatives that are on a completely different level wrt the point & shoot cameras above.
Wish I could find a Zuiko 40mm f/2 pancake for a reasonable amount, accept I'm going to need slightly bigger pockets, and call off the search for a 35mm everyday carry.
Wish I could find a Zuiko 40mm f/2 pancake for a reasonable amount, accept I'm going to need slightly bigger pockets, and call off the search for a 35mm everyday carry.
I use 2 Duracell CR 1/3N 3volt Lithium batteries in My Minox 35 GT I buy from Amazon, and have no problems.
Belated response but I've recently acquired a couple of GLs - do these batteries fit straight in with no adaptation? I was just a bit confused by someone below saying they are narrower and longer than the originals? Thanks!
Belated response but I've recently acquired a couple of GLs - do these batteries fit straight in with no adaptation? I was just a bit confused by someone below saying they are narrower and longer than the originals? Thanks!
Thanks for the replies, much appreciated. The GL preceded the GT by two years and is the same camera effectively but without the self timer I think?
Is there any reason I couldn't just use LR44s for which I know there's an adapter available (or a bodge with aluminium foil!)? They are slightly thicker I think but in all other respects better and longer lasting?
Never use alkaline. Use Silver Oxide or Lithium.
So SR44s, but why not alkaline...? Shorter life? Should I default to CR3/1Ns as suggested?
Because of their discharge curve and leaking properties.
Lithium is preferable - it also have a very long shelf life.
Great, thank you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?