Minolta MC Rokkor-X 85mm f1.7

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
OK, i 'accidentally' hit buy-it-now on a Minolta MC Rokkor-X f1.7.
(at least thats what I told my wife)

Problem is, I dont have a minolta body to mount it on. =]
So, this may end up being my 5th 35mm SLR *system* to buy in to.
(A friend of mine just gave me an EOS 50, so that makes 6 systems, but I havent paid for anything in that yet, so it doesnt count)

I've read some of the recent posts about the good cameras to buy.
So I am considering a XD-11 or X-570 to get me started.

What do you think about the lens?
I looked at Flickr and I liked the examples better than the examples from the Canon FD 85mm f1.8 and Olympus 85mm f2 (nicer bokeh and color).
 

Christopher Walrath

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
Great fast lens. Awesome light. Rokkor is a plus. I would personally recommend a sr-T101. It can operate fully mechanical (sans battery, no meter) and it has mirror lockup. It's a tank, an awesome camera. Or there a few here that would gladly take it from your hands.
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,049
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
The XD11 is considered by many to be the best body Minolta made. The X700 (as opposed to the X570) was the last top-of-the-line body in production and both are fine performers. You will probably find an X700 (or Xxxx) cheaper than an XD11. I own both and they are both fine.

The X700 has a "P" program mode that will not fully function with the "MC" lens you bought. The P mode requires a "MD" mount lens. The XD11 has both aperture and shutter priority, but not a program mode. Take a look at the Rokkor files: Dead Link Removed and http://www.photoclubalpha.com/useful-and-vital-links/minolta-history-seven-decades/

Not to contradict Walrath, the SRT's are fine cameras, and if you pay more than $30 for one, you've done it wrong.

darinwc said:
So, this may end up being my 5th 35mm SLR *system* to buy in to.
Click to expand...

You do realize that this is a disease ...
 
OP
OP

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
"Or there a few here that would gladly take it from your hands."

I might be interested in a Olympus 85mm f2.

"The XD11 is considered by many to be the best body Minolta made. "

Thats what seems to be the favorite. But is it so well liked because of reliability, features, or what?

"The Minolta XE-7 / XE-1 is my favorite."
I owned a XG-1 or maybe it was an XG-7.. but either way I was not impressed. I'm not sure how they differ than the XE series.

"The X700 has a "P" program mode that will not fully function with the "MC" lens you bought."
-Thank you, you just saved me from buying another camera that I would have to buy separate lenses for =].

"But I also own the SRT- 101, SRT-303, and X-700."
"The SRT's Are Mechanical Brutes."
I've held a SRT before and it was a little too big/heavy for my tastes.

"You do realize that this is a disease ..."
-yes, I have fully embraced my addiction. I dont pretend that I am going to be any better because of it, I just enjoy the ride.
 

DLM

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
102
Location
Central Coas
Format
35mm
The XD11 is a great camera. It has a nice quiet shutter and a feeling of pure quality. I just sold mine on ebay just because it never gets used, although I was really reluctant to get rid of it.
 

Focus No. 9

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
240
Format
35mm
Okay... y'all convinced me to take the SRT101 on my road trip. (nothing exciting...primarly open prarie once I pass Flagstaff)
1. SRT 101 kit.
2. P3n
3. SuperProgram
4. Fujica ST605 (if I get the seals replaced in time)
5. Vito II...it's about time I try it out along with my EXA
6. Pentax Auto 110 for funzies. And the Kodak Motormatic R4
7. the Minolta 2xi.
8. Batteries
9. Film
10.Tripod
11. Black Duct Tape

HELP HELP HELP HELP. I haven't even started on the Lens list. YIKES.
Ooh ooh,I'm gonna stick a few moth balls into the case containing the 120-600 Viv. and take it just in case I see some pronghorns. I'll be skidding into homeplate just in time for chow if I take all that gear. jeepers.

so that's 4 non-fool proof and 4 fairly fool proof and 8 possible light leaks. One fool, one fool's dog, green alligators and long-necked geese. Some humpty backed camels and some chimpanzees. Some cats and rats and elephants, but sure as you're born ... and the lovelist of all was a Minolta MC Rokkor-X 85mm f1.7
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,757
Format
35mm
I wound up with three 100/2.5 MC Rokkors. The 85s are all very expensive and I prefer the slightly longer focal length. For portraits I like to use a grid type or plain matte focusing screen. It makes it easier to focus on the eyes. When the X-700 came out in 1981 I thought it was a step backward for Minolta. It has a slower flash synch speed than the XD-11 and a horizontal cloth shutter. It also lacks the ability to provide Shutter Priority automation even with MD lenses. On the plus side, the X-700 has interchangeable focusing screens, TTL flash metering, a sensitive and accurate meter and a very bright and sharp viewfinder. If I find an 85 Rokkor at the right price I may get one. I'm not in a hurry because I have other 85s, even if they are not for Minolta. These include an 85/1.8 Konica Hexanon, an 85/1.8 Canon New FD, an 85/1.8 Canon FL and an 85/2 AI Nikkor. In good light and with a lens as fast as the 85/1.7 MC Rokkor-X any Minolta body would be fine. In lower light or when TTL flash is handy the X-700 is more versatile. I should say that the X-700 focusing screens, apart from the standard one, are not very easy to find.

Even though I like the 85s I have I am more likely to use a 100/2.8 Canon FD or 100/2.5 MC Rokkor or 135/2.8 Vivitar Close Focusing in Konica mount for portrait shooting.
 

ath

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2006
Messages
844
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
I have the X700, the XD7 (XD11) and two SRT's. I prefer the x700 slightly over the XD7.
If you can get over the plastic you are rewarded with a better grip due to the molded in grip and slightly more responsiveness compared to the XD7.
For me the handholdability of the X700 is better.

Here is a useful feature compare table for the electronic Minoltas albeit in german.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mr rusty

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
827
Location
lancashire,
Format
Medium Format
Don't overlook the x300/x370 if you come across one. Lightweight with aperture priority auto. Basic but functional. Nice bright viewfinder. Exactly the same size as my OM1/2, but lighter.

Downsides - no mirror lock up (but I never use that anyway), no exposure compensation (except there is by adjusting asa), not the quietest shutter.

Overall a robust, budget shooter that goes for peanuts. Oh and if you get given a dead one, high possibility the fault is a 1$ capacitor that you can replace in 10 minutes.

I only have the 50mm 1.7 as a prime, but its terrific - much better than the minolta 35-70 and tokina 70-210 I also have for it.
 

mudman

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
335
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
I have an XE-5 for sale with 50mm f1.4 lens for $60, let me know if you're interested. I'm trying to consolidate down to Nikon and Leica.
 

stevco

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
94
Location
Macedonia, O
Format
35mm
You got a hell out of a lens there. They must be fantastic for portraits/low light/even macro etc.

I shoot with SRT 101, 58mm 1.4 and 35mm 2.8, and I would reccomend this body, pretty strong, good in hand, all mechanical, but if you can found some newer SRT or X/XD model, it would be better i think in a term of durability etc, but I would say that it depends, my SRT 101 works great for this half a year.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Ron LarFor4X5 said:
I see your pointe Steve.
I stand corrected.
I will remember to use the correct spelling from now on.
Click to expand...

You should carry on spelling it your way otherwise your fellow countrymen will think you're weird.... or Canadian!


Steve.
 

Vonder

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2007
Messages
1,237
Location
Foo
Format
35mm
I have an ugly XD-11 "beater" body you are welcome to have for shipping cost. It works fine, except the film counter sticks on occasion and never makes it past 33 or so. Send me a PM if you'd like to have it.
 

flashgumby

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
76
Location
Lake Macquar
Format
35mm
Steve Smith said:
You should carry on spelling it your way otherwise your fellow countrymen will think you're weird.... or Canadian!

Steve.
Click to expand...

or British, or Australian, or Kiwi, or from pretty much any English-speaking nation...

As far as the camera body goes - I agree with Rusty. The X300 is a real surprise - small and light, a great easy-to-use option and you can get them for almost nothing because they are plentiful and don't have a 7 in their name.

Of course the big-name guys such as the SRT-101 (and 102/303/Super), XE1/XE7, XD7/XD11 and X700 are more popular, but if you're not lucky you might have to dig deep (comparatively) to get a good one.

Whatever you do, take comfort in knowing that the lens you "accidentally" bought is worth buying a body for.

Regards,
Gordon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…