And anyone tempted to call out on conspiracy theories, I’d remind them that the conspiracy theorists were laughed at for mentioning that there would be more than one dose, here we are at the 4th “booster” assorted with various threats by the good ole authorities.
The human involvement is present though imho. The computer and software were made by humans, the internet image banks that the software accesses were largely made by humans (assuming I understand correctly what the software is doing), the little haiku instructions are given to the software by a human, the scale/color/cropping/editing/printing/display decisions all made by humans, etc etc.
How soon (if not already) will all service calls be handled by AI (in the approbiate language and/or accent of the caller)?
I already have gotten computer-generated voice messages.
That will happen to some of them, true enough. I've been in the product development business for too long, and have friends in the prototype and toolmaking/mold making businesses that have seen their livelihoods challenged by CNC machining, rapid prototyping, and now 3d printing. They all had to quickly decide the best course for them when the technological leaps threatened their traditional ways.The issue many working artists will have is that this takes their work away.
Notice that I do not comment on AI? I worked on it for years. Among other things I learned is that there is a lot of the opposite of artificial intelligence, it is called real stupidity.
This image above never existed until that moment. It's not grabbing it from a google image search or anything like that, it is creating it out of thin air based on what it knows.
That was a good read, thanks. I liked this quote:A timely article by Kotaku's Luke Plunkett on the possible implications of AI-generated art:
https://kotaku.com/ai-art-dall-e-midjourney-stable-diffusion-copyright-1849388060
I worked in AI for years. The goal then was to make machines that people could not detect that the machines made the decisions. We are still not there yet and AI is not going produce a scient being since all it can do is learn, not develop new ideas or concepts.
these products are definitely using prior art
AI not being able to develop itself dies not matter, it’s about who’s controling it.
I want to know how you get to Samy's?? Route 66 is too busy to ride one's bicycle. Tesla? Helicopter? I heard that California is banning all film cameras by 2035, everything is going electric.
I want to know how you get to Samy's?? Route 66 is too busy to ride one's bicycle. Tesla? Helicopter? I heard that California is banning all film cameras by 2035, everything is going electric.
The trouble with AI is that it is only human...
In other words, it should be AHI...artificial human intelligence.
The ultimate human break-through in understanding the universe will be when we can create artificial non-human intelligence. Imagine that...a computer built based of whale intelligence!
That is only the beginning. The grand scheme being to make AI efficient. This is the baby step to reading the human mind, and of course controling. The iphone already reading the retina being another baby step.
And anyone tempted to call out on conspiracy theories, I’d remind them that the conspiracy theorists were laughed at for mentioning that there would be more than one dose, here we are at the 4th “booster” assorted with various threats by the good ole authorities.
Yes, we are in hell. This is where we live.
Let's try to stay on topic, which seems to be AI involvement in the art space.
I've been following Dalle2 and the others for a while. The thing with AI is it advances exponentially. So by the time you type "Yeah, but it could never do x, y, z" it is already doing x, y and z and likely more.
I would imagine AI will be the most disruptive thing we will ever witness. It's hard to predict where this will all go.
Sean, did you read the article in post 31? Perhaps the software you're using works differently but some of these products are definitely using prior art (including artists' signatures and watermarks) to make new work. I don't know how else a prompt that includes Vermeer's girl with a pearl earring could spit out anything without starting with an image of that work.
Edit:
Another rather frightening quote from an Atlantic article - “DALL-E is trained on the creative work of countless artists, and so there’s a legitimate argument to be made that it is essentially laundering human creativity in some way for commercial product.”
I put myself on the waitlist for DALL-E today. I want to see for myself what's happening here.
I see it as the opposite. Compared to living in a small tribal unit, there is not much difference in the level of our 'freedom' now. Social restraints are/were as strong as US Supreme Court decisions.The external world is becoming more controlled. In your mind and in your art you are still free.
I put myself on the waitlist for DALL-E today. I want to see for myself what's happening here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?