• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Metal binding - a question for the chemically inclined.

Forum statistics

Threads
203,284
Messages
2,852,337
Members
101,760
Latest member
zhao chen
Recent bookmarks
0

nhemann

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
206
Location
NJ - Near NY
Format
Multi Format
I read an article in the NYT a bit ago about how they are using fish bone meal to bind up lead in soil into compounds that cannot be absorbed by the body. It got me thinking if this would be applicable to some of the chemicals/metals used in the darkroom. Unfortunately, my chemistry is nowhere near what it should be to answer that question myself - I'm just a lowly marine engineer :wink:

The article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/21/science/earth/21fishbones.html?pagewanted=2
 
Silver is a lot easier to recover from fixer that mining it. No need to neutralize it.
 
I was never so worried about silver - the value drives its own recovery proceses and there are plenty of outlets, even if its just another person with a recovery unit. I'm especially thinking about less desirable metals like selenium and other intensifier/toners. Or for that matter just some of the more noxious beasties that could be bound up and essentially inerted.

The extreme example, though obviously not applicable, would be the vitrification of reactor material to stabilize it for long term storage.
 
The only heavy metals in films or papers are Osmium, Rhodium and Iridium. They are present at about 10^-6 moles per mole of silver, and the silver is present at about 300 mg / foot square in a high speed B&W film. So, there is no big worry about the film or paper.

Selenium is a problem, of course as are gold toners and some other toners. If there are concerns, they must be disposed of as hazardous waste in compliance with local regulations. Silver in the fixer is not a big problem as it can be recovered.

PE
 
Hi PE,

I was hoping you would chime in sooner or later - to speak to my original point, would it be possible to do what they did in the article? i.e bind up the typical photography metals in such a way to render them essentially inert?
I realize it might be an academic question in the end but my curiosity was piqued when I read it.
neil
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, at the end of the process, all Silver ions are bound up in the fixer, or washed out in the wash.

About all you can do is reclaim the Silver as metal via electrolysis or precipitate it out as the Hydroxide. One is easy and the the other is complex. The easy one is by electrolysis and the simplest is just throwing a chunk of steel wool into the fixer. However, this too begs the issue by replacing Silver with Iron. In the final analysis (pun intended) you end up replacing one chemical with another in all of these and local laws may be the final controlling factor.

PE
 
Read up on the sequestering properties of EDTA if you are interested in one way that heavy metals are extracted from those who have absorbed too much. I beleive the term is 'chelating agent'.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom