Thank you for your comment. I know exactly what you mean, but the lens is just an instrument and can be used in different ways by different photographers. Those sample shots were taken to show the lens' ability to produce a "signature" swirls, but it is very easy to take a pictures without it, by using a smaller apertures, or placing the subject at different distances,or simply by cropping the final image. Using a smaller sensor cameras will cut the swirls off too. I'm sure you know what I mean - it is not always easy to get those swirls from the Petzval, but you can, if you want to.Interesting project. I don't know if you have the optical design locked in, but the swirl seems excessive to me. The best properties of the Petzval have nothing to do with swirl--which is a one-trick pony. In any case good luck with your kickstarter, I think it's great that people are reproducing a classic lens design that still has a place in photography.
Thanks! Sure, I will. But it won't be soon. Currently I'm working on lens with Hasselblad " V " mount for 2000 or 200 series.this looks great - if you ever decide to make one for the Mamiya RB series let me know!
Thank you, Bill! Yes, when the price of the camera body is under a 200$ including the metering prism and a film magazine, I would not call it "Buying a new system". When Leica S2 cameras came to market, a friend of mine bought himself an adapter for using a Hasselblad lenses with it. He paid 365$ for adapter only.Solved the Kickstarter issue. I'm in. Good luck on the project. Buying into a new system? Not really, just buying into about a $900 camera and lens. Much less than several I aleady own.
Of course, that is not what I mean. I'm just comparing the price of the whole Kiev camera with the price of a lens adapter. Nothing more, nothing less. There are no such a versatile lens, compatible to every camera system, and in this case the price of adapter for your preferred camera system can be compared to a price of camera body.If you consider spending 200$ not as buying, you got too much money.
The Flange Focal distance of Pentax 67 is 84.95 mm, which is greater then 74.1 mm of P6 FFD. It will be very difficult, if possible at all, to make an adapter. No hyperfocal distance focusing.will this works on Pentax 67?
The Flange Focal distance of Pentax 67 is 84.95 mm, which is greater then 74.1 mm of P6 FFD. It will be very difficult, if possible at all, to make an adapter. No hyperfocal distance focusing.
Just following up my previous answer about compatibility with P67: I have never seen such an adapter, because in this case it takes to bring the lens mount deeper into the body. I have heard about the lens modification, but it all depends on the lens construction, because if its rear element part protruding deep enough, it will be in the way of reflex mirror.Thanks!
Will it works, then with P67 to P645 adapter?
Yes, you are right! The lens has a variable iris aperture. I will add f/16 to technical details. It is my Nikkor's 1.4 fault ) It has such a shallow DOF at close up distance even at f/8.You should make it clearer at your website that your lens has a a variable aperture (at least I assume so...)
The only hints are two photographs of the lens showing a row of unsharp figures at the front of the barrel, several figures at the focusing mark and the term "max. aperture".
unlike the Lomo's version they are still using the waterhouse aperture system.
Hope to see your project materialise !
Hi Denys,
Any updateds with this project ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?