When I first got my 4x5 enlarger it came with Kodak polycontrast filters. I was finding I was having to use high grades to get decent prints on Ilford MC papers. This winter I invested in Ilford filters, and am printing mostly using 2 to 3 filters, even 1 1/2 once or twice. I'm also finding split grade printing is giving me better results.
Has anyone else noticed this difference? Or am I seeing what I want to see after shelling out for the filters?
Yes, filters do fade and do occasionally need replacing. That said, there are differences between the Kodak and Ilford variable grade filters. For a given filter number, each will deliver a different result.
Ahhh ha!.... Thank you. I had no idea they faded. Chances are the Kodak ones were years, maybe even a couple of decades old.
I'm very happy with my new Ilford ones and will replace them in a timely fashion.
If you need a new set of filters we should still have promotional packs in the USA that had 50 sheets of Multigrade and a set of 6" x 6" filters included.
Although I don't think I've seen aging in my filter pack yet (8 years old, stored carefully and dark) it was reason enough for me to eventually get a color enlarger with non fading dichroic filters for my VC prints.